SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.71 número280Factores de riesgos psicosociales en funcionarios que trabajan en centros de salud Chillán, 2024Prevalencia y experiencia del estrés durante el internado médico de pregrado: un estudio mixto en una universidad de Ciudad de México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo

versión On-line ISSN 1989-7790versión impresa ISSN 0465-546X

Med. segur. trab. vol.71 no.280 Madrid jul./sep. 2025  Epub 30-Sep-2025

https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0465-546x2025000300003 

Artículos originales

Burnout syndrome associated with occupational characteristics of health workers

Síndrome de burnout asociado a características laborales de los trabajadores de la salud

Diana Paola Montealegre Suárez (orcid: 0000-0001-9780-2584)1  , Maira Alejandra Camargo Valderrama (orcid: 0000-0003-1066-0427)1  , Diana María Salazar Rojas (orcid: 0000-0002-8892-355X)1  , Maria Carolina Cerón Polanco (orcid: 0000-0001-7030-2053)2  , Claudia Yasmin Pérez (orcid: 0000-0002-3287-0129)3  , Daniela Fernanda Hueso Garzón (orcid: 0000-0002-2788-7540)3 

1Fundación Universitaria María Cano, Neiva - Huila. Colombia.

2Fundación Escuela Tecnológica de Neiva, Jesús Oviedo Pérez, Neiva - Huila. Colombia.

3Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD, Neiva - Huila. Colombia

Abstract

Introduction: Burnout syndrome is considered the physical and psychological fatigue suffered by workers due to their work activity. This syndrome is characterized by the presence of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of personal fulfillment.

Objetive: Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the presence of Burnout Syndrome associated with the labor characteristics of health workers in Neiva-Colombia.

Methodology: It was a study with a quantitative-cross-sectional approach, with a non-experimental design and correlational scope. It included an approximate population of 2,600 health workers from Neiva- Colombia, from the different clinics and hospitals in the same city. The criteria for inclusion were that the Health professionals be of the legal age. Also, they were currently working in clinics and hospitals in the city of Neiva. On the other hand, the professionals who did not sign the informed consent and did not answer questions on each of the tests were excluded. The instruments for Burnout Syndrome, is made up of 22 questions and evaluates the three dimensions of Burnout syndrome: Emotional exhaustion (nine), depersonalization (five statements), and professional fulfillment (eight statements).

Results: Regarding the dimensions of Burnout, it was evidenced that 50% of health workers present emotional exhaustion, 60.2% present medium and high levels of Depersonalization, and 61.0% report having a low Personal Accomplishment.

Conclusion: the burnout syndrome in the health professionals evaluated presents a more significant commitment to the Personal Realization dimension and depersonalization and emotional exhaustion. It is necessary to develop preventive medicine programs that mitigate this health problem.

Keywords: Health; Occupational Health; Mental Health; Burnout; Psychological; Depersonalization; Disease

Resumen

Introducción: Se considera síndrome de Burnout al cansancio físico y psíquico que sufren los trabajadores debido a su actividad laboral. Este síndrome se caracteriza por la presencia de agotamiento emocional, despersonalización y falta de realización personal.

Objetivo: Por tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue identificar la presencia del Síndrome de Burnout asociado a las características laborales de los trabajadores de la salud en Neiva-Colombia.

Metodología: Fue un estudio con enfoque transversal cuantitativo, con diseño no experimental y alcance correlacional. Incluyó una población aproximada de 2.600 trabajadores de la salud de Neiva- Colombia, de las diferentes clínicas y hospitales de la misma ciudad. Los criterios de inclusión fueron que los profesionales de la Salud fueran mayores de edad. Asimismo, actualmente se encontraban laborando en clínicas y hospitales de la ciudad de Neiva. Por otro lado, se excluyeron los profesionales que no firmaron el consentimiento informado y no respondieron las preguntas de cada una de las pruebas. El instrumento para el Síndrome de Burnout, está compuesto por 22 preguntas y evalúa las tres dimensiones del síndrome de Burnout: Agotamiento emocional (nueve), despersonalización (cinco enunciados) y realización profesional (ocho enunciados).

Resultados: En cuanto a las dimensiones del Burnout, se evidenció que el 50% de los trabajadores de la salud presenta agotamiento emocional, el 60,2% presenta niveles de Despersonalización medio y alto, y el 61,0% refiere tener una Realización Personal baja.

Conclusión: el síndrome de burnout en los profesionales de la salud evaluados presenta compromiso más significativo en la dimensión Realización Personal y despersonalización y agotamiento emocional. Es necesario desarrollar programas de medicina preventiva que mitiguen este problema de salud.

Palabras clave: Salud; Salud Laboral; Salud Mental; Agotamiento Psicológico; Despersonalización; Enfermedad

Introduction

Burnout syndrome is considered the physical and psychological fatigue suffered by workers due to their work activity. This syndrome is characterized by the presence of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of personal fulfillment1.

Emotional exhaustion is characterized by a lack of energy, fatigue, and lack of work motivation. It is associated with personal problems and workload. Likewise, depersonalization triggers anxiety, irritability, self-centeredness, and demotivation behaviors. These signs are generally the product of emotional detachment. At the same time, the lack of personal fulfillment leads to the worker negatively evaluating himself and not feeling satisfied with his job performance2.

This syndrome generates an increase in stress levels, physical fatigue, insomnia, and family problems, which undoubtedly directly impact the worker and the companies where they work since the quality of the service provided to customers can be seen to deteriorate. by these factors1.

In this sense, the Burnout Syndrome associated with work is considered a health problem that can affect any worker. In particular, those whose activity is related to the care of the human being3. Authors such as Urbanetto et al.4, indicate that this syndrome is very prevalent among health professionals because they permanently contact people. As well as the work conditions, personal problems, and other factors of occupational stress trigger a negative impact on the worker’s physical, mental, and social well-being.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality estimates that burnout may affect 10-70% of nurses and 30-50% of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants5.

However, before the pandemic, health professionals were exposed to various psychosocial factors such as isolation, little social support, discrimination, and even violence by other people. This has increased since the declaration of the health emergency by COVID-19, triggering alterations in mental health such as low mood, low motivation, more significant fatigue, depression, anxiety, and other severe effects on mental health6.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the presence of Burnout Syndrome associated with the labor characteristics of health workers in the municipality of Neiva-Colombia.

Methodology

Subjects

It was a study with a quantitative - cross-sectional approach, with a non-experimental design and correlational scope. It included an approximate population of 2,600 health workers from Neiva- Colombia, from the different clinics and hospitals in the same city. The formula for finite populations was used to find the study sample. There was a margin of error of 5%, a probability of occurrence of 0.25, and a confidence level of 99% for 254 health professionals.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The criteria for inclusion were that the Health professionals be of the legal age. Also, they were currently working in clinics and hospitals in the city of Neiva. On the other hand, the professionals who did not sign the informed consent and did not answer questions on each of the tests were excluded.

Ethics

Initially, each of the research participants was informed of the purpose, benefits, and risks of this research. The informed consent was then filled out, which was used as support to verify the desire to be part of the research process.

The research development took resolution 008430 and the Declaration of Helsinki into account. Likewise, it was approved by the ethics committee in Colombia.

Instruments

Labor characteristics: An instrument was created and put into an expert judgment for posterior use in measuring the variable (aspects related to the conditions of work, such as working hours, rest times, seniority in the position, and functions performed).

Burnout Syndrome: This instrument is made up of 22 questions and evaluates the three dimensions of Burnout syndrome: Emotional exhaustion (nine), depersonalization (five statements), and professional fulfillment (eight statements). It has been used in multiple investigations since it is considered the most widely used and accepted instrument to assess the key symptoms of Burnout syndrome2,7,8,9,10,11.

The information analysis was conducted by the statistical program SPSS version 26, which calculated the measures of central tendency, means, maximum and minimum values, and standard deviation.

Additionally, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normality of the data. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to verify the relationship between the research variables. Finally, it includes the ANOVA test and Levine’s test to demonstrate the significant differences between the means of the variable position and physical condition. Conducting these analyses with a level of statistical significance of p < 0.05.

Results

Table 1 Distribution of the dimensions of the Burnout Syndrome. 

Variable n %
emotional exhaustion Alto 59 23,2%
Medio 68 26,8%
Bajo 127 50,0%
Total 254 100%
depersonalization Alto 82 32,2%
Medio 71 28,0%
Bajo 101 39,8%
Total 254 100%
Personal fulfillment Alto 45 17,7%
Medio 54 61,0%
Bajo 155 61,0%
Total 254 100%

Regarding the dimensions of Burnout, it was evidenced that 50% of health workers present emotional exhaustion, 60.2% present medium and high levels of Depersonalization, and 61.0% report having a low Personal Accomplishment (see table 1). Likewise, the study shows a statistically significant association between health professionals and the dimensions of the Burnout Syndrome (p<0.05) (see table 2)

Table 2 Association between the variables of Burnout and health professionals. 

Burnout Chi2 emotional exhaustion Chi2 Depersonalization Chi2 Personal fulfillment Chi2
Low Medium High Low Medium High Low Medium High Low Medium High
Health workers 38 142 74 0,02 127 68 59 0,00 101 71 82 0,0 155 54 45 0,01

Figures 1 and 2 reveal that nursing assistants have the highest levels (medium-high) of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, followed by doctors and nursing managers. This behavior is maintained in the Personal Accomplishment dimension, where low levels are evident in these same health professionals (see Figure 3).

Figure 1 Profession distribution according to the emotional exhaustion dimension 

Figure 2 Distribution of profession according to Depersonalization dimension 

The analysis of variance (ANOVA 3x3), using the: level of Burnout as a factor and seniority, the hours of work and time off as dependent variables, shows that there are statistically significant differences between the levels of Burnout and seniority p<0.001, hours of work p<0.000 and rest time p<0.04, (See table 3).

Table 3 Labor variables depend on the level of Burnout. Comparison of means figure 1. Profession distribution according to the emotional exhaustion dimension 

Burnout Antiquity Work Hours Break time
High 6,30+/-5,6 8,796+/-2,9 6,46+/-1,2
Medium 5,37+/-4,51 8,32+/-2,7 6,87+/-1,41
Low 5,50+/-3,02 8,36+/-2,7 6,13+/-1,0
0,001* 0,000* 0,04*
6,31** 10,214** 2,03**

P*: One-way Anova

**Levene statistic

Figure 3 Distribution of the profession according to the Personal Fulfillment dimension 

The Burnout dimensions showed a robust positive correlation between emotional exhaustion and hours of work r = 0.947, depersonalization and hours of work r = 0.966, and hours of rest and Burnout r = 0.976 (see table 4).

Table 4 Correlations between labor variables and Burnout dimensions 

Variables Antiquity Work Hours Break Time
Antiquity 1
Work Hours ,834 1
Break Time ,246 ,012 1
emotional exhaustion ,053 ,947* ,364
Depersonalization ,667 ,966* ,367
Personal fulfillment ,616 ,471 ,401
Burnout ,156 ,716* ,976*

**. The correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (bilateral).

*. The connection is significant at the 0.05 level (bilateral).

Discussion

The present study shows that the most compromised dimension of Burnout in health professionals corresponds to personal fulfillment and depersonalization. These results differ from what was found by Torres et al, 202112 in their study, which reveals that the prevalence of Burnout Syndrome was high, especially in the component of depersonalization (95%) and emotional exhaustion (47%) and in a lower percentage in personal fulfillment (11%).

Various authors reveal that health professionals who develop Burnout syndrome have a higher average number of hours worked per day Gutiérrez-Lesmes, Loboa-Rodríguez, & Martínez-Torres13 and the work area Navarro-González, Ayechu-Díaz, & Huarte-Labiano14. These data are similar to what was found by authors such as Millán and D, Aubeterre15, who indicate that among the labor factors that trigger Burnout Syndrome in doctors is the number of hours they work daily or weekly.

Luengo et al.16 indicate that among the factors associated with Burnout syndrome are labor factors, with the dimensions of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization being the most compromised.

An investigation of radiologists and non-radiologists concluded that radiologists were more likely to feel unhappy and underappreciated in the workplace17. In nursing professionals, authors such as Gutiérrez et al.13 indicate higher proportions of emotional fatigue with 42%, emotional depersonalization with 38%, and lack of personal fulfillment with 30%.

Yslado and et al.18, indicate that health professionals who present high levels of Burnout syndrome may be associated with work variables, work overload, interpersonal conflicts, few stimuli at the work level, promotion limitations, dissatisfaction with salary, among others.

Therefore, authors such as Arrogante19 indicate that it is necessary to design and implement prevention programs that positively influence the health and well-being of health professionals to improve their health, quality care and care provided, and patient safety and reduce the economic costs of health institutions.

It is concluded that the burnout syndrome in the health professionals evaluated presents a more significant commitment to the Personal Realization dimension and depersonalization and emotional exhaustion. It is necessary to develop preventive medicine programs that mitigate this health problem

References

1. Garrido-Hermosilla AM, Soto-Sierra M, Díaz-Ruiz MC, Gutiérrez-Sánchez E, Rodríguez-de-la-Rúa Franch E. Syndrome of professional wear and tear or «burnout» in Andalusian ophthalmology. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2021; 96(2):63-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.oftal.2020.08.002Links ]

2. Corsino de Paiva L, Gomes Canário AC, Corsino de Paiva China EL, GonçalvesI AK. Burnout syndrome in health-care professionals in a university hospital. Clinical Science. 2017; 72(5): 305-309. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(05)08Links ]

3. Bouza E, Gil-Monte PR, Palomo E. Síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (burnout) en los médicos de España. Rev Clin Esp. 2020; 359-363. DOI: 10.1016/j.rce.2020.02.002Links ]

4. Urbanetto Jde S, da Silva PC, Hoffmeister E, de Negri BS, da Costa BE, Poli de Figueiredo CE. Workplace stress in nursing workers from an emergency hospital: Job Stress Scale analysis. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011; 19(5):1122-31. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-11692011000500009Links ]

5. Patrick J. Bridgeman PB. Burnout syndrome among healthcare professionals. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2018; 75(3): 147-152. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp170460Links ]

6. Juárez-García A. Síndrome de burnout en personal de salud durante la pandemia COVID-19: un semáforo naranja en la salud mental. Salud UIS. 2020; 53(4): 432-439. DOI: 10.18273/revsal.v52n4-2020010Links ]

7. Ebling M, Carlotto MS. Burnout syndrome and associated factors among health professionals of a public hospital. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2012; 34(2). DOI: 10.1590/S2237-60892012000200008Links ]

8. Sofology M, Efstratopoulou M. Predicting Burnout Syndrome in Greek Mental Health Professionals. Journal of Social Service Research. 2019; 142-149: DOI: 10.1080/01488376.2018.1480556 [ Links ]

9. Sorce Moreira A, De Lucca SR. Psychosocial factors and Burnout Syndrome among mental health professionals. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020; 28(3336). DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.4175.3336Links ]

10. Fernández-Sánchez JC, Pérez-Mármol JM, Blásquez A, Santos-Ruiz AM, Peralta-Ramírez MI. Association between burnout and cortisol secretion, perceived stress, and psychopathology in palliative care unit health professionals. Palliat Support Care. 2018;16(3):286-297. DOI: 10.1017/s1478951517000244Links ]

11. Bhagavathula AS, Abegaz TM, Belachew SA, Gebreyohannes EA, Gebresillassie BM, Chattu VK. Prevalence of burnout syndrome among health-care professionals working at Gondar University Hospital, Ethiopia. J Educ Health Promot. 2018: 27;7:145. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_196_18Links ]

12. Torres Toala FG, Piñeiros VI, Moreno AP, Ruilova Coronel EA, Casares Tamayo J, Mendoza Mallea M. Síndrome de Burnout en profesionales de la salud del Ecuador y factores asociados en tiempos de pandemia. Rev. virtual Soc. Parag. Med. Int. 2021; 8(1). DOI: 10.18004/rvspmi/2312-3893/2021.08.01.126Links ]

13. Gutiérrez-Lesmes O, Loboa-Rodríguez N, Martínez-Torres J. Prevalencia del Síndrome de Burnout en profesionales de enfermería de la Orinoquia colombiana, 2016. Universidad y Salud. 2018; 20(1): 37-43. DOI: 10.22267/rus.182001.107Links ]

14. Navarro-González D, Ayechu-Díaz A, Huarte-Labiano I. Prevalencia del síndrome del burnout y factores asociados a dicho síndrome en los profesionales sanitarios de Atención Primaria [Prevalence of burnout syndrome and its associated factors in Primary Care staff]. Semergen. 2015; 41(4):191-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2014.03.008Links ]

15. Millán de Lange A, D’Aubeterre López M. Propiedades psicométricas del Maslach Burnout Inventory-GS en una muestra multiocupacional venezolana. Rev Psicol PUCP. 2012; 30(1): 103-28. [ Links ]

16. Luengo Martínez C, Hidalgo Arriagada N, Neumann GJ, Rivera Gutiérrez R. Burnout en Profesionales de Enfermería de la Atención Primaria de Salud: una Revisión Sistemática. Revista Enfermería del Trabajo. 2019; 9(3): 124-138. [ Links ]

17. Giess CS, Ip IK, Gupte A, Dudley JC, Healey MJ, Boland GW, Khorasani R. Self-reported Burnout: Comparison of Radiologists to Nonradiologist Peers at a Large Academic Medical Center. Acad Radiol. 2022; 29(2): 277-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.013Links ]

18. Yslado Méndez RM, Norabuena Figueroa RP, Loli Poma TP, Zarzosa Marquez E, Padilla Castro L, Pinto Flores I, Rojas Gamboa A. Burnout syndrome and job satisfaction in health professionals. Horizonte Médico (Lima). 2019; 19(4): 41-49. DOI: 10.24265/horizmed.2019.v19n4.06Links ]

19. Arrogante O, Aparicio-Zaldivar EG. Burnout syndrome in intensive care professionals: relationships with health status and wellbeing. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020; 31(2): 60-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.enfi.2019.03.004Links ]

Funding

The research was funded by the María Cano University Foundation.

Received: January 23, 2025; Accepted: August 29, 2025; Revised: June 30, 2025

Correspondence Diana Paola Montealegre Suárez dianapaolamontealegresuarez@fumc.edu.co

The authors express that there are no conflicts of interest when writing the manuscript.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons