SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.107 número6Hemocholecyst: a rare cause of acute abdomenPileflebitis y abscesos hepáticos secundarios a apendicitis aguda evolucionada índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas

versión impresa ISSN 1130-0108

Rev. esp. enferm. dig. vol.107 no.6 Madrid jun. 2015

 

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

 

Well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of the appendix and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm presenting as a collision tumor

 


Key words: Appendiceal neoplasms. Neuroendocrine tumors. Psedomyxoma peritonei. Adjuvant chemotherapy.


 

Dear Editor,

Primary tumors of the appendix represent approximately 0.4% of all gastrointestinal tract tumors (1) and are usually incidentally found in about 1% of appendectomies (2) with collision tumors being extremely unusual in this location (3-5). In this report, we present two cases of collision tumors with low-grade mucinous neoplasm of the appendix and well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

 

Case report

Case 1. A 49-year-old female presented with an epigastric hernia that was taken to surgery. Pathologic diagnosis of the hernial sac revealed acellular mucin which prompted other diagnostic studies. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen revealed a cystic mass in the right lower quadrant with free fluid in the paracolic gutter that measured 7 cm in greatest dimension with a calcified rim (Fig. 1). She was taken to radical cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. An enlarged perforated mass of the appendix was found intraoperatively (Fig. 1). The patient's peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 27 and complete cytoreduction was achieved. Her postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged from the hospital on day 11 without complications.

 

 

Case 2. A 45-year-old male complained of 3 years of progressive abdominal distension who finally presented in 2011 with an epigastric hernia, Preoperative imaging studies revealed free fluid in abdominal cavity. He was taken to diagnostic laparoscopy that confirmed an epigastric hernia, multiple abdominal mucinous tumor implants and a tumor-like lesion on the tip of the appendix. An appendectomy and omentectomy were performed at the moment at another institution. In 2012, this patient was taken to radical and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy cytoreduction, finding extensive involvement by an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. In 2013 presented with perihepatic and pleural recurrences and extensive progression of the abdominal disease was documented. Due to inability to achieve complete cytoreduction, it was recommended to treat with chemotherapy alone.

Microscopic findings in both cases showed collision of two different neoplastic proliferations: The first neoplasia was a well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and the second one was a cystic lesion lined by well-differentiated mucinous epithelium with a villous architecture (Fig. 1). The appendiceal mucin dissected focally the wall and had numerous acellular mucinous implants in the abdominal cavity. No transition of the two epithelial components was seen and no regional lymph nodes were compromised.

Immunohistochemistry in both patients showed positivity of the neuroendocrine tumors with chromogranin (Fig. 1E) and synaptophysin (Fig. 1F). The Ki67 was 1% in both cases. These findings were consistent with a well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, grade 1 (carcinoid tumor) according to the current WHO classification (6). The mucinous neoplasms were positive for cytokeratin 20 and CDX-2 and negative for cytokeratin 7, the findings were consistent with low-grade mucinous neoplasias of the appendix according to Misdraji et al. (7).

 

Discussion

A collision tumor is defined by two histologically different neoplasias that grow at the same anatomic location without transition and with a different clonal origin. These are different than mixed tumors, which share the same carcinogenic pathway but later on differentiate in two different histological phenotypes (3).

Although mixed tumors are rare in the gastrointestinal tract, the appendix is one of the most common sites for its development (3,8). Most of the cases reported in the literature are adenocarcinoid tumors and Goblet cell carcinoids (8), these tumors are different entities where the morphology resembles Goblet cells but the immunophenotype is neuroendocrine (9).

Collision tumors of the appendix are even rarer, to our knowledge these is the fourth report of cases after Singh et al. (3), Rossi et al. (5) and Chetty et al. (10) and is also the only collision tumor formed by a well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and a low grade mucinous neoplasia. The histologic findings are relevant for the prognosis and treatment of the patient because usually is the most aggressive component the one that metastasize and determines the evolution of the disease (3).

 

Javier Baena-del-Valle1, Mauricio Palau-Lázaro1, Marcela Mejía-Arango1,
Jorge Otero2, Eduardo Londoño-Schimmer1, Natalia Cortes3, Marcos Pozo3,
Gabriel Herrera-Almario3, Fernando Arias3 and Paula Rodriguez-Urrego1

1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
2Department of Oncology.
3Department of Surgery, Peritoneal Neoplasms Group. University Hospital Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá. Bogotá, Colombia

 

References

1. Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: Retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:75-80.         [ Links ]

2. McCusker ME, Coté TR, Clegg LX, et al. Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: A population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973-1998. Cancer 2002;94:3307-12.         [ Links ]

3. Singh NG, Mannan AASR, Kahvic M, et al. Mixed adenocarcinoma-carcinoid (collision tumor) of the appendix. Med Princ Pract 2011;20:384-6.         [ Links ]

4. Jain M, Das KK. Concurrent occurrence of terminal ileum carcinoid tumor and cecal adenocarcinoma: A collision tumor or composite tumor? Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2009;52:285-6.         [ Links ]

5. Rossi G, Bertolini F, Sartori G, et al. Primary mixed adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma of the appendix: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study of a hitherto unreported tumor. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:1233-9.         [ Links ]

6. Bosman FT, editor. World Health Organization IA for R on C. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2010.         [ Links ]

7. Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, et al. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:1089-103.         [ Links ]

8. Levendoglu H, Cox CA, Nadimpalli V. Composite (adenocarcinoid) tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:519-25.         [ Links ]

9. Tang LH. Epithelial neoplasms of the appendix. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010;134:1612-20.         [ Links ]

10. Chetty R, Klimstra DS, Henson DE, et al. Combined classical carcinoid and goblet cell carcinoid tumor: a new morphologic variant of carcinoid tumor of the appendix. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34:1163-7.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons