SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.66 número3Evaluación de la distribución y captación de [18F]FDG mediante microPET/CT en un modelo murino de infarto de miocardioValidez y fiabilidad de la versión en español del cuestionario SKILLD en una población panameña índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Ars Pharmaceutica (Internet)

versión On-line ISSN 2340-9894

Ars Pharm vol.66 no.3 Granada jul./sep. 2025  Epub 20-Jun-2025

https://dx.doi.org/10.30827/ars.v66i3.32202 

Artículos originales

The Albizia julibrissin and Caesalpinia decapetala extracts induces potential enzymes and cell growth inhibition via anti-acetylcholinesterase, anti-lipase, anti-glycation and cytotoxicity activity

Los extractos de Albizia julibrissin y Caesalpinia decapetala inducen la inhibición potencial de enzimas y el crecimiento celular a través de la actividad antiacetilcolinesterasa, antilipasa, antiglicación y citotoxicidad

Iram Fatima1  2  , Naila Safdar1  , Razia Kalsoom2  , Wasim Akhtar3  , Syed Hussain Imam Abidi4  , Gul-e-Saba Chaudry (orcid: 0000-0002-4555-8572)5  , Samia Akmal1 

1Department of Biotechnology, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi Pakistan.

2PCSIR Labs Complex, Plot no. 16, Sector H-9, Islamabad-44000, Pakistan.

3Department of Botany, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad-13100, Pakistan.

4Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR), Head Office, 1-Constitution Avenue, G-5/2 Islamabad-44000, Pakistan.

5Institute of Climate Adaptation and marine Biotechnology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia.

Abstract

Introduction:

Medicinal plants are dynamic source of human health because of their therapeutic potential in treating various ailments. This study aimed to determine the anti-acetylcholinesterase, anti-lipase, anti-glycation and anti-cancer activities of Albizia julibrissin and Caesalpinia decapetala (family Fabaceae).

Methods:

The leaf extracts were prepared to investigate their inhibitory capacities against acetylcholinesterase, lipase and glycation products. The anti-cancer potential was evaluated against HeLa, PC3 and 3T3 cell lines using MTT assay and HPLC analysis was done to quantify six compounds.

Results:

Results indicated highest anti-acetylcholinesterase (IC50 2.391 µg/ml) activity in A. julibrissin methanolic extract while highest anti-lipase (114.9 µg/ml) and anti-glycation (43.69 µg/ml) activity was recorded in C. decapetala methanolic extract. Highest cytotoxic potential was also observed in C. decapetala against PC3, 3T3 and HeLa cell lines (144.3 ppm, 201.0 ppm and 236.0 ppm). In the end, HPLC showed that A. julibrissin exhibit the highest concentration of chlorogenic acid (56.06 ppm) and quercetin dihydrate (15.71 ppm) while C. decapetala leaves extracts possess highest concentration of gallic acid (73.55 ppm).

Conclusions:

The results suggest that these extracts significantly inhibit the enzymatic activities, glycation products and the growth of cytotoxic cells and thus, can be used as novel pharmacological leads to treat various diseases.

Keywords: Cancer; Enzymes; lipase; High-performance Liquid Chromatography; Medicinal Plants

Resumen

Introducción:

Las plantas medicinales son una fuente dinámica de salud humana debido a su potencial terapéutico en el tratamiento de diversas dolencias. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar las actividades antiacetilcolinesterasa, antilipasa, antiglicación y anticancerígena de Albizia julibrissin y Caesalpinia decapetala. (family Fabaceae).

Métodos:

Los extractos de hojas se prepararon para investigar sus capacidades inhibitorias contra la acetilcolinesterasa, la lipasa y los productos de glicación. El potencial anticancerígeno se evaluó contra las líneas celulares HeLa, PC3 y 3T3 utilizando el ensayo MTT y se realizó un análisis HPLC para cuantificar seis compuestos.

Resultados:

Los resultados indicaron la mayor actividad anti-acetilcolinesterasa (IC50 2,391 µg/ml) en el extracto metanólico de A. julibrissin, mientras que la mayor actividad anti-lipasa (114,9 µg/ml) y anti-glicación (43,69 µg/ml) se registró en el extracto metanólico de C. decapetala. El mayor potencial citotóxico también se observó en C. decapetala contra las líneas celulares PC3, 3T3 y HeLa. (144,3 ppm, 201,0 ppm and 236,0 ppm). Al final, la HPLC mostró que A. julibrissin exhibe la mayor concentración de ácido clorogénico (56,06 ppm) y dihidrato de quercetina (15,71 ppm), mientras que los extractos de hojas de C. decapetala poseen la mayor concentración de ácido gálico. (73,55 ppm).

Conclusiones:

Los resultados sugieren que estos extractos inhiben significativamente las actividades enzimáticas, los productos de glicación y el crecimiento de células citotóxicas y, por lo tanto, pueden ser utilizados como nuevos compuestos farmacológicos para tratar diversas enfermedades.

Palabras clave: Cáncer; Enzimas; lipasa; Glucosilación; Cromatografía líquida de alta resolución; Productos naturales

Highlights

  • Medicinal plants, including Albizia julibrissin and Caesalpinia decapetala from the Fabaceae family, have significant therapeutic potential in managing various health conditions. This study aimed to investigate their ability to inhibit acetylcholinesterase, lipase, glycation, and cancer cell growth.

  • The methanolic extract of A. julibrissin exhibited the strongest acetylcholinesterase inhibition with an IC50 of 2.391 µg/ml.The methanolic extract of C. decapetala showed the most potent lipase inhibition (114.9 µg/ml) and anti-glycation activity (43.69 µg/ml). C. decapetala extract demonstrated significant cytotoxic effects on PC3 (144.3 ppm), 3T3 (201.0 ppm), and HeLa (236.0 ppm) cell lines.

  • HPLC analysis revealed that A. julibrissin contained high levels of chlorogenic acid (56.06 ppm) and quercetin dihydrate (15.71 ppm), while C. decapetala was rich in gallic acid (73.55 ppm).

Introduction

Oxidative stress produces excessive free radicals that damage cell components viz. lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and nucleic acid; resulting in neurodegenerative and metabolic disorders such as Alzheimer disease (AD), cancer and diabetes1. According to an estimate, about 55 million people were diagnosed with AD in 2020 and this number may increase to 78 million in 20302. One of the most useful approaches to treat AD includes increasing acetylcholine (ACh) levels in the brain3. AChE is the major enzyme in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and its suppression reduces the Alzheimer’s disease4. The synthetic drugs adverse reactions have prompted researchers to screen alternative natural plant-based products to treat AD5,9. Similarly, obesity and inactive lifestyles have caused diabetes in many individuals by increasing blood glucose levels in the body. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) observed 537 million diabetic individuals in 20216. Due to the increased insulin resistance, hyperglycemic condition leads to the protein glycation of proteins that produces advanced glycation end products (AGEs)7-8. Moreover, cancer is another critical life-threatening condition and the cervical cancer accounts for 15.9 % of the total cancer with 300,000 million cases every year10.

Previously, some studies have explored the biological properties of Fabaceae species. For instance, Albizia julibrissin is traditionally used to treat ulcers, fractures, anxiety, bruises and hemorrhoids11-12. Caesalpinia decapetala is used as antiseptic, astringent, analgesic, anti-pyretic and to treat burns13-14. Due to the multiple health benefits of these species, present studies were designed to investigate the acetylcholinesterase, porcine pancreatic lipase, non-enzymatic glycation and cytotoxic inhibitory potential of A. julibrissin and C. decapetala. Additionally, the concentration of six compounds was evaluated using HPLC.

Methods

Extracts preparation

Fresh leaves of A. julibrissin subsp. Julibrissin and C. decapetala (Roth) Alston were collected and their accession numbers were obtained from the Herbarium of National Agriculture Research Center (NARC), Islamabad. The weight of extracts was measured to ascertain extract yield as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 List of selected species, their accession numbers and extract yield. 

Plant species Accession Numbers Extracts Extract weight (g) Extract yield (%)
A. julibrissin RAW101502 Methanol 5.32 26.60
Meth-DMSO 5.80 29.00
C. decapetala RAW101504 Methanol 7.53 37.65
Meth-DMSO 8.07 40.35

*Meth: Methanol; DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide; the weight of extract was taken in grams (g) and the extract yield was measured in percentage (%).

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory assay

The acetylcholinesterase inhibition potential was assessed using 140 µL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8) was added in 20 µL of plant extract, 15 µL of AChE enzyme solution (0.2 units/ml) and 10 µL of 15 mM DTNB followed by the incubation for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance of the final product was measured at 412 nm and galantamine (100, 500 and 1000 µg/ml) was measured as a positive control. The enzyme inhibition was determined as

Where Vmax is an enzyme activity without inhibitor.

Lipase inhibitory assay

Briefly, 5 mg/ml lipase from porcine pancreatic type II (Sigma) was added to 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) and then centrifuged for 5 min at 5500 rpm. Then, 100 µL of lipase solution was added to 50 µL of plant extract (100, 500 and 1000 µg/ml prepared in DMSO) and left for incubation on ice and the absorbance was noted at 405 nm. Orlistat was measured as a standard and the inhibition potential was calculated 15.

Anti-glycation assay

The AGE inhibition in plant extracts was determined using the method16. The fluorescence was measured at the emission wavelength of 440 nm and the percentage inhibition of AGE formation was calculated as:

Cytotoxicity assay against various cell lines

MTT assay

The cytotoxic potential of selected extracts was evaluated using standard MTT (3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) colorimetric assay17-18. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm and the percentage inhibition and IC50 values were calculated.

HPLC análisis

The plant extracts (1 mg) were dissolved in 5 ml of 10 % methanol and then filtered using membrane filters of 0.45 nm size. An Agilent 1260 HPLC system having a quaternary pump, auto-sampler and C18 column was run at 30 °C and the mobile phase was degassed before injecting into the HPLC. The separation was achieved using 0.2 % H3PO4, methanol and acetonitrile and flow rate was 1 ml/min. The mobile phase was increased from 0 to 15 %, 50 %, 70 %, 100 % and then kept isocratic for additional 5 min. The injected volume was 10 µL and the wavelength was set at 210 nm. The standards were measured at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 70 ppm concentrations to derive the calibration equation. Total four phenolic compounds and two flavonoid compounds were identified based on their retention times and UV spectras’. The concentration of compounds was determined using peak area of samples versus the analyte concentration obtained from the calibration curve 19.

Statistics

All experiments were conducted in duplicate. Results were interpreted with mean ±SD and Least Significant Difference (LSD) was evaluated using Statistix 8.1. Moreover, the IC50 values in all biological assays were determined using GraphPad Prism 5 software.

Results and Discussion

Anti-acetylcholinesterase assay

Plants are the potential source of compounds that can prevent or treat neurodegenerative diseases by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase20. The present study revealed highest acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity in A. julibrissin methanolic extract (IC50 2.391 µg/ml) followed by A. julibrissin methanol-DMSO extract (IC50 10.16 µg/ml) and C. decapetala methanolic extract (IC50 22.79 µg/ml). However, C. decapetala methanol-DMSO extract showed lowest anti-acetylcholinesterase activity by displaying IC50 value of 30.24 µg/ml (Table 2).

Table 2: Anti-acetylcholinesterase activity of extracts 

Plant species Extracts Percentage Inhibition at Different Doses (µg/ml) IC50 values
100 500 1000
A. julibrissin Methanol 71.4 74.4 83 2.391
Methanol-DMSO 75 78.7 94.6 10.16
C. decapetala Methanol 63.5 70.0 82 22.79
Methanol-DMSO 65.3 69 90.86 30.24
Standard* 78.0 84.5 93 5.99

*Galantamine was used as a standard and IC50 values indicates half maximal inhibitory concentration and is measured in µg/ml

The AChE inhibition potential of these extracts could be attributed to the existing phenolic and flavonoid compounds (21. A previous report 22 indicated anti-acetylcholinesterase activity in the ethanolic leaves extracts of Albizia lucidor (IC50 24.89 ± 1.60 µg/ml) and Albizia procera (IC50 43.50 ± 2.10 µg/ml). In another study, 23 demonstrated highest inhibition potential (10.20 mg galantamine equivalent/g) of C. decapetala leaves extracts against butyrylcholinesterase. However, the acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of selected species has been examined for the first time. It can be inferred that the variations within the same plant species could be due to the different phyto-constituents of the plants that are grown in various geographical areas in different seasons of the year. The phyto-constituents may vary depending on the soil, water, stage of plant and the time of collection (24. It can be suggested that A. julibrissin and C. decapetala leaves may serve as an ideal candidate for designing new AChE inhibitors to treat neurodegenerative disorders. However, detailed in vivo tests are needed to validate the efficiency of these species for medicinal use.

Anti-lipase and anti-glycation assays

The inhibition of pancreatic lipase (a lipolytic enzyme) and glycation products is a highly effective method that protects against fat absorption in individuals with obesity and hyperglycemia25. In this study, pancreatic anti-lipase and anti-glycation potential of two species have been investigated and results are presented in Figure 1a and b. The highest lipase and glycation inhibitory potential was observed in C. decapetala methanolic extract (IC50 114.9 µg/ml and 43.69 µg/ml) followed by the methanol-DMSO extract of A. julibrissin (IC50 138.7 µg/ml and 74.06 µg/ml). However, weak anti-lipase and anti-glycation activity was recorded in A. julibrissin methanolic extract (IC50 155.2 µg/ml and 182.5 µg/ml) and C. decapetala methanol-DMSO extract (IC50 168.4 µg/ml and 247.3 µg/ml) respectively (Table 2). The remarkable inhibitory activity of selected extracts indicates their potential use as a powerful source of anti-obesity and anti-glycation agents.

Previously, researchers have investigated biological potential of different species of Albizia and Ceasalpinia grown in different regions of world. For instance, (26 demonstrated pancreatic lipase inhibition potential in Caesalpinia sappan commonly grown in Thailand. Contrarily, (27) observed no lipase inhibitory potential in Albizia lebbeck that was grown in Thailand. It can be inferred that species belonging to the same family, irrespective to different climatic conditions, exhibit potent anti-lipase and anti-glycation activities. The relative bio-efficacy can be ascribed to the presence of phenolic and flavonoid compounds as suggested in previous literature (28-29. However, the plant extract is a mixture of bioactive compounds that contribute to the bioactivities altogether. This suggests that the composition of active compounds, structural features and other potential factors in plant extract may have also affected pancreatic lipase and hyperglycemic conditions. Therefore, the exact relationship between the active compounds and biological activities needs to be further investigated.

Table 2b: Percentage inhibition and IC50 values observed in anti-lipase and anti-glycation assays. 

Plant species Extracts Anti-lipase assay (µg/ml) Anti-glycation assay (µg/ml)
Percentage Inhibition IC50 values Percentage inhibition IC50 values
100 500 1000 100 500 1000
A. julibrissin Methanol 45.89 ± 3.35 60.64 ± 1.06 67.85 ± 4.87 155.2 43.90 ± 4.10 54.25 ± 1.76 82.95 ± 1.34 182.5
C. decapetala Meth-DMSO 46.60 ± 4.12 62.90 ± 1.95 77.49 ± 3.81 138.7 56.00 ± 2.12 70.60 ± 5.65 89.10 ± 1.41 74.06
Methanol 48.30 ± 5.72 68.40 ± 0.43 77.50 ± 1.85 114.9 58.50 ± 4.94 69.50 ± 0.70 78.85 ± 3.04 43.69
Meth-DMSO 41.52 ± 2.83 67.10 ± 3.45 76.56 ± 3.53 168.4 43.00 ± 2.82 53.95 ± 0.07 63.05 ± 1.34 247.3
Control 49.00 ± 1.41 59.00 ± 1.41 81.00 ± 1.41 127.5 69.00 ± 2.82 77.70 ± 0.84 88.50 ± 1.27 17.33

Meth. stands for methanol and DMSO stands for dimethyl sulfoxide; Values in tables are presented as mean ± SD (n=3); IC50 value indicates half maximal inhibitory concentration.

Orlistat was used as a control in anti-lipase assay and rutin was used as a control in anti-glycation assay.

Figure 1: Anti-lipase and anti-glycation activity of leaves extracts of selected species (a) Anti-lipase assay (b) Anti-glycation assay. *Data indicates mean ± SD (3n) and each alphabetical letter (a-g) indicates a significance difference at P < 0.05. *Orlistat was used as a control in anti-lipase assay and rutin was used as a control in anti-glycation assay. 

Cytotoxic activity

As the methanolic extracts displayed significant biological activities, hence were further tested to observe there in vitro cytotoxic potential against three different cell lines. Among different plant extracts, C. decapetala showed highest cytotoxic potential against PC3 and 3T3 cell lines by showing IC50 value of 144.3 ppm and 201.0 ppm. Contrarily, the lowest activity was recorded in A. julibrissin methanolic extract against PC3 cell lines (IC50 459.8 ppm) and 3T3 cell lines (IC50 392.6 ppm). However, the moderate inhibitory potential was observed in both species when tested against HeLa cell lines. Overall, C. decapetala leaf extract displayed the highest cytotoxic potential compared to A. julibrissin (Table 3).

Table 3: The cytotoxicity effects observed in selected species against HeLa, PC3 and 3T3 cells. 

Plant species Cell lines Percentage Inhibition at Different Concentrations (ppm) IC50 (ppm)
30 60 90 120 150
A. julibrissin HeLa 0 1.2 4.9 9.7 14.7 285.4
PC3 0 1.2 2.7 4.3 6.1 459.8
3T3 -2.8 0 2.8 5.1 7.3 392.6
C. decapetala HeLa 0 1.1 5.5 11.6 19.6 236.0
PC3 10.6 21.2 31.8 42.4 53 144.3
3T3 1.7 3.3 6.2 7.4 23.8 201.0

IC50: Half-maximal inhibitory concentration.

Previously, (30) isolated emodin, baicalein and apigenin from C. decapetala roots and confirmed their anti-tumor activities against human gastric carcinoma cell line MGC-803 cell line with IC50 values of 15.6, 16.3 and 13.2 µmol/L using MTT assay. Our studies also corroborate the earlier findings 23 who reported highest cytotoxicity (i.e. 46.08 µg/ml CC50) for the bark methanol extract of C. decapetala on the HeLa cells. Moreover, previous researcher 31) isolated oleanane-type saponins, julibrosides, from the stem bark of A. julibrissin and examined their cytotoxic effects against HCT-116, BGC-823, HepG2 and A549 cell lines. Earlier studies 32,33 revealed anti-cancer activity of another specie of Albizia genus i.e. Albizia lebbeck using MCF-7 (human breast cancer), HeLa and A549 cell lines. However, A. julibrissin leaves extracts have been examined for the first time against selected cell lines. The anti-carcinogenic potential of examined species could be attributed to the active compounds such as Julibroside saponins present in A. julibrissin34. In general, leaves of selected species showed promising results as a cytotoxic agent due to the relatively high toxicity on selected cells. Hence, it can be inferred that the exact mechanism of apoptosis should be investigated using flow cytometry and microscopy techniques.

HPLC análisis

In current study, HPLC method was used to quantify six compounds present in the leaves of selected species. The obtained HPLC chromatograms are presented in Figure 2 (a to d) which indicated that A. julibrissin possesses highest concentration of chlorogenic acid (56.06 ppm) and quercetin dihydrate (15.71 ppm) while C. decapetala leaves extracts exhibit the highest concentration of gallic acid (73.55 ppm). However, all other compounds were detected in lower concentrations (i.e. below 12 ppm) in these species (Table 4).

Figure 2: HPLC chromatograms indicating six phenolic and flavonoid compounds at respective retention times in selected species (a) Gallic acid, vanillic acid, chlorogenic acid, rutin trihydrate and quercetin dihydrate in A. julibrissin (b) Caffeic acid in A. julibrissin (c) Gallic acid, vanillic acid, chlorogenic acid, rutin trihydrate and quercetin dihydrate in C. decapetala (d) Caffeic acid in C. decapetala

Table 4 Concentration of six compounds observed in selected species using HPLC. 

Plant species Concentration of compounds (ppm)
Gallic acid Caffeic acid Vanillic acid Chlorogenic acid Rutin trihydrate Quercetin dihydrate
A. julibrissin 1.75 11.81 6.61 56.06 0.11 15.71
C. decapetala 73.55 0.29 4.92 8.89 1.02 ND

*ND: Not detected

Previously, scientists 13 showed the presence of gallic acid, quercetin, catechin, 4-hydroxybenoic acid and p-coumaric acid as the main phenolic compounds in C. decapetala extracts using the HPLC technique which has been confirmed in the current study. Similarly, 35 reported eight compounds in C. decapetala using UPLC-MS/MS. Furthermore, (36-37 indicated the presence of lignans, triterpenoids saponins and some phenolic compounds in the stem bark of A. julibrissin. Besides, cassane diterpenoid, caesaldecan, squalene, lupeol, resveratrol, quercetin, stigmasterol and astragalin, the main phytochemicals observed in C. decapetala are terpenoids, flavonoids and tannins38. It can be inferred that the selected species possesses a valuable reservoir of polyphenolic compounds of pharmacological significance and thus needs to be isolated and investigated for food and industrial application.

Conclusion

In the light our findings, it can be concluded that the methanolic extracts exhibited the most pronounced biological activities compared to the methanol-DSMO extracts of two selected species. A. julibrissin methanolic extract showed highest acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity while C. decapetala methanolic extract displayed highest anti-lipase, anti-glycation and cytotoxic potential. HPLC indicated that A. julibrissin possesses highest concentration of chlorogenic acid and quercetin dihydrate while C. decapetala leaves extracts exhibited highest concentration of gallic acid. Therefore, the results of this study reinforce the potential therapeutic benefits of A. julibrissin and C. decapetala methanolic extracts. Further research and clinical trials are required to validate these findings and thereby uncover more evidence of its biological activities.

Bibliography

1 Wojtunik-Kulesza KA, Oniszczuk A, Oniszczuk T, Waksmundzka-Hajnos M. The influence of common free radicals and antioxidants on development of Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;78:39–49. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2015.12.024. [ Links ]

2 Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63–75. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007. [ Links ]

3 Yiannopoulou KG, Papageorgiou SG. Current and future treatments in Alzheimer disease: an update. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2020;12:1179573520907397. doi:10.1177/1179573520907397. [ Links ]

4 Köse LP, Gülçin İ, Gören AC, Namiesnik J, Martinez-Ayala AL, Gorinstein S. LC–MS/MS analysis, antioxidant and anticholinergic properties of galanga (Alpinia officinarum Hance) rhizomes. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;74:712–21. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.05.034. [ Links ]

5 Chu YC, Chang CH, Liao HR, Fu SL, Chen JJ. Anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory activities of three new chromone derivatives from the marine-derived Penicillium citrinum. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(8):408. doi:10.3390/md19080408. [ Links ]

6 Hossain MJ, Al-Mamun M, Islam MR. Diabetes mellitus, the fastest growing global public health concern: Early detection should be focused. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(3):e2004. doi:10.1002/hsr2.2004. [ Links ]

7 Mata-Torres G, Andrade-Cetto A, Espinoza-Hernandez F. Approaches to decrease hyperglycemia by targeting impaired hepatic glucose homeostasis using medicinal plants. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:809994. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.809994. [ Links ]

8 Ramsay RR, Tipton KF. Assessment of enzyme inhibition: a review with examples from the development of monoamine oxidase and cholinesterase inhibitory drugs. Molecules. 2017;22(7):1192. doi:10.3390/molecules22071192. [ Links ]

9 Xu-Dong H, Li-Lin S, Yun-Feng C, Yi-Nan W, Qi Z, Sheng-Quan F, et al. Pancreatic lipase inhibitory constituents from Fructus Psoraleae. Chin J Nat Med. 2020;18(5):369–78. doi:10.1016/S1875-5364(20)30043-1. [ Links ]

10 de Sanjose S, Tsu VD. Prevention of cervical and breast cancer mortality in low-and middle-income countries: a window of opportunity. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:381–6. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S197115. [ Links ]

11 Kang J, Huo CH, Li Z, Li ZP. New ceramides from the flower of Albizia julibrissin. Chin Chem Lett. 2007;18(2):181–4. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2006.12.042. [ Links ]

12 Ikeda T, Fujiwara S, Araki K, Kinjo J, Nohara T, Miyoshi T. Cytotoxic glycosides from Albizia julibrissin. J Nat Prod. 1997;60(2):102–7. doi:10.1021/np960556t. [ Links ]

13 Gallego MG, Skowyra M, Gordon MH, Azman NAM, Almajano MP. Effect of leaves of Caesalpinia decapetala on oxidative stability of oil-in-water emulsions. Antioxidants. 2017;6(1):19. doi:10.3390/antiox6010019. [ Links ]

14 Parveen A, Akash MS, Rehman K, Mahmood Q, Qadir MI. Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-pyretic activities of Caesalpinia decapetala. Bioimpacts. 2014;4(1):43. doi:10.5681/bi.2014.013. [ Links ]

15 Chen Z, Zhang D, Guo JJ, Tao W, Gong RX, Yao L, et al. Active components, antioxidant, inhibition on metabolic syndrome-related enzymes, and monthly variations in mature leaf hawk tea. Molecules. 2019;24(4):657. doi:10.3390/molecules24040657. [ Links ]

16 Franco RR, Zabisky LF, de Lima Júnior JP, Alves VH, Justino AB, Saraiva AL, et al. Antidiabetic effects of Syzygium cumini leaves: A non-hemolytic plant with potential against processes of oxidation, glycation, inflammation, and digestive enzymes catalysis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;261:113132. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2020.113132. [ Links ]

17 Masood S, et al. Zn(II) and Cd(II) pincer complexes bearing meta alkylated pyridinium amidates; synthesis & preliminary anticancer studies. New J Chem. 2023;47(47):21845–53. [ Links ]

18 Mehmood R, Sadiq A, Alsantali RI, Mughal EU, Alsharif MA, Naeem N, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 1,3,5-triaryl-2-pyrazoline derivatives as potent dual inhibitors of urease and α-glucosidase together with their cytotoxic, molecular modeling, and drug-likeness studies. ACS Omega. 2022;7(4):3775–95. doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c06694. [ Links ]

19 Abdelkhalek A, Salem MZ, Kordy AM, Salem AZ, Behiry SI. Antiviral, antifungal, and insecticidal activities of Eucalyptus bark extract: HPLC analysis of polyphenolic compounds. Microb Pathog. 2020;147:104383. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104383. [ Links ]

20 Tuzimski T, Petruczynik A. Determination of anti-Alzheimer’s disease activity of selected plant ingredients. Molecules. 2022;27(10):3222. doi:10.3390/molecules27103222. [ Links ]

21 Ferreira J, Santos S, Pereira H. In vitro screening for acetylcholinesterase inhibition and antioxidant activity of Quercus suber cork and corkback extracts. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:3825629. doi:10.1155/2020/3825629. [ Links ]

22 Hussein ME, Mohamed OG, El-Fishawy AM, El-Askary HI, Hamed AA, Abdel-Aziz MM, et al. Anticholinesterase activity of budmunchiamine alkaloids revealed by comparative chemical profiling of two Albizia spp., molecular docking, and dynamic studies. Plants. 2022;11(23):3286. doi:10.3390/plants11233286. [ Links ]

23 Zengin G, Mahomoodally MF, Picot-Allain MCN, Sinan KI, Ak G, Etienne OK, et al. Chemical composition, biological properties and bioinformatics analysis of two Caesalpina species: A new light in the road from nature to pharmacy shelf. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021;198:114018. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114018. [ Links ]

24 Gomes AF, Almeida MP, Leite MF, Schwaiger S, Stuppner H, Halabalaki M, et al. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of two chemotypes of Lippia alba. Food Chem. 2019;273:186–93. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.11.089. [ Links ]

25 Herrera T, Del Hierro JN, Fornari T, Reglero G, Martin D. Inhibitory effect of quinoa and fenugreek extracts on pancreatic lipase and α-amylase under in vitro traditional conditions or intestinal simulated conditions. Food Chem. 2019;270:509–17. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.145. [ Links ]

26 Ruangaram W, Kato E. Selection of Thai medicinal plants with anti-obesogenic potential via in vitro methods. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13(4):56. doi:10.3390/ph13040056. [ Links ]

27 Sirichai P, Kittibunchakul S, Thangsiri S, On-Nom N, Chupeerach C, Temviriyanukul P, et al. Impact of drying processes on phenolics and in vitro health-related activities of indigenous plants in Thailand. Plants. 2022;11(3):294. doi:10.3390/plants11030294. [ Links ]

28 Wang R, Wang L, Zhang L, Wan S, Li C, Liu S. Solvents effect on phenolics, iridoids, antioxidant activity, antibacterial activity, and pancreatic lipase inhibition activity of noni (Morinda citrifolia L.) fruit extract. Food Chem. 2022;377:131989. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131989. [ Links ]

29 Zeng SL, Li SZ, Wei MY, Chen BZ, Li P, Zheng GD, et al. Evaluation of anti-lipase activity and bioactive flavonoids in the Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium from different harvest times. Phytomedicine. 2018;43:103–9. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2018.04.008. [ Links ]

30 Wei XH, Yang SJ, Liang N, Hu DY, Jin LH, Xue W, et al. Chemical constituents of Caesalpinia decapetala (Roth) Alston. Molecules. 2013;18(1):1325–36. doi:10.3390/molecules18011325. [ Links ]

31 Han Q, Qian Y, Wang X, Zhang Q, Cui J, Tu P, et al. Oleanane-type saponins and prosapogenins from Albizia julibrissin and their cytotoxic activities. Phytochemistry. 2021;185:112674. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112674. [ Links ]

32 Kavitha CN, Raja KD, Rao SK. Antitumor activity of Albizia lebbeck L. against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in vivo and HeLa and A549 cell lines in vitro. J Cancer Res Ther. 2021;17(2):491–498. doi:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_454_9. [ Links ]

33 Desai TH, Joshi SV. Anticancer activity of saponin isolated from Albizia lebbeck using various in vitro models. J Ethnopharm. 2019;231:494–502. doi:10.016/j.jep.2018.11.004. [ Links ]

34 Han Q, Qian Y, Wang X, Zhang Q, Cui J, Tu P, et al. Cytotoxic oleanane triterpenoid saponins from Albizia julibrissin. Fitoterapia. 2017;121:183–93. doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2017.07.015. [ Links ]

35 Ghavidel A, Bak M, Hofmann T, Hosseinpourpia R, Vasilache V, Sandu I. Comparison of chemical compositions in wood and bark of Persian silk tree (Albizia julibrissin Durazz.). Wood Mater Sci Eng. 2022;17(6):759–70. doi:10.1080/17480272.2021.1953141. [ Links ]

36 Li YT, Liu H, Meng WS, Zhou T, Gong ZP, Huang Y, Zheng L. Simultaneous determination of content of eight components in Caesalpinia decapetala by UPLC-MS/MS. Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi (China J Chin Mater Med). 2022;47(3):692–700. doi:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20211011.201. [ Links ]

37 Li W, Yang HJ. Isolation and identification of lignans and other phenolic constituents from the stem bark of Albizia julibrissin Durazz and evaluation of their nitric oxide inhibitory activity. Molecules. 2020;25(9):2065. doi:10.3390/molecules25092065. [ Links ]

38 Van Kiem P, Van Minh C, Huong HT, Lee JJ, Kim YH. Caesaldecan, a cassane diterpenoid from the leaves of Caesalpinia decapetala. Chem Pharm Bull. 2005;53(4):428–30. doi:10.1248/cpb.53.428. [ Links ]

Received: December 10, 2024; Accepted: March 23, 2025

Correspondence Gul-e-Saba Chaudry, Naila Safdar gul.saba@umt.edu.my, nailahussain@fjwu.edu.pk

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License