SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.27 issue9Vesicouterine fistulae: 25 years of our experienceMultilocular cystic nephroma: A new case presentation author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links


Actas Urológicas Españolas

Print version ISSN 0210-4806


MOYANO CALVO, J.L.  and  CASTINEIRAS FERNANDEZ, J.. Ureteroenteric anastomoses: Our experience. The simpliest, the best. Actas Urol Esp [online]. 2003, vol.27, n.9, pp.713-717. ISSN 0210-4806.

INTRODUCTION: There are many techiques describe for ureteroenteric anastomoses. We present our experience with three of them inorder to reduce the stenosis rate. METHOD AND MATERIAL: We have done radical cystectomy in 77 patients. Urinary diversion with small bowel in 20 patients (Paduana ileal neobladder) and dstubulized ureterosigmoidostomy (MainzII) in 55. Initialy, we used Le Duc technique, afterward Ricard technique and actually bivalva technique (direct). RESULTS: We have performed Le Duc in 38%, Ricard in 31% and "bivalva" in 27%. Median follow-up are 37,7 months, 19,9 months and 10 months respectivily. Stenosis: 16,7% with Le Duc; 20,5% with Ricard and 9,1% with bivalva technique. Renal anulation: 10,4% with Le Duc; 10,3% with Ricard and 0% with bivalva (p .000). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the less stenosant anastomose is BivalvaIn one. The simpliest technique, the best results. The rate of stenosis is higher when the upper urinary tract is dilatated pre-surgery, independently of the anastomosis technique.

Keywords : Stenosis; Ureteroenteric anasatomose; Noebladder.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )


Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License