SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.32 issue3Prognostic factors in localised and regionally advanced renal cell carcinomaRelation between some thecniques of hypospadias repair and complications: Universitary San Vicente de Paul Hospital 1986-2005 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Actas Urológicas Españolas

Print version ISSN 0210-4806


SOLA DALENZ, V.; RICCI ARRIOLA, P.  and  PARDO SCHANZ, J.. Urodynamic study in the female urinary incontinence evualuation, with the new monitorrMR system (nonmultichannel urodynamic with urethral retro-resistance pressure measure): Experience with 100 patients. Actas Urol Esp [online]. 2008, vol.32, n.3, pp.325-331. ISSN 0210-4806.

Objective: To compare the clinical diagnosis of the urinary incontinence with the results of LPP and URP obtained by non-multichannel urodynamic. To evaluate the tolerance of the patients to this examination. Pathient and Method: Between August and December 2006, 100 urodynamics were made in patients with clinical diagnosis of urinary incontinence, in the Urogynecology Unit of Clínica Las Condes. The clinical diagnosis was compared with the urodynamic results. A subjective tolerance scale was applied (0 was greater tolerance and 10 was maximum discomfort). Results: In 66 patients with clinical diagnosis of IUS, the urodynamic registered 10 Type 0, 2 (I), 23 (II), 1 (III), 17 (II+III),1 hyperactive detrusor, 5 (0+ hyperactive detrusor), 3 (II+hyperactive detrusor) and 4 (II+III+hyperactive detrusor). In 15 with Mixed urinary incontinence, the urodynamic showed 6 (Type 0), 2 (II), 2 (II+III), 3 hyperactive detrusor, 1 (II+hyperactive detrusor) and 1 (III+hyperactive detrusor). In 16 patients with urgency incontinence, urodynamic showed 2 normal, 4 (II+III), 7 hyperactive detrusor, 1 (II+hyperactive detrusor) and 2 (II+III+hyperactive detrusor). In 3 patients (two vaginal cuff prolapse and one cistocele, degree IV POP-Q) the urodynamic was indicated in the pre-surgery study considering a great potentially incontinence after correction. Respectively, the patients presented: IUS type III+hyperactive detrusor, IUS type II+III and one normal. All patients expressed 2 and 3 degree tolerance (subjective scale: 1 major tolerance and 10 a minor tolerance). Conclusions: The MoniTorrMR urodynamic is a complementary examination very useful in the study of the urinary incontinence. It allows planning the solution adapted for each case and has a high degree of tolerance in the patients.

Keywords : Urodinamyc; URP; Multichannel Urodynamic; Urinary Incontinence; Stress urinary incontinence.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )


Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License