My SciELO
Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Share
Medicina Intensiva
Print version ISSN 0210-5691
Abstract
GIL CANO, A.; MONGE GARCIA, M.I. and BAIGORRI GONZALEZ, F.. Evidence on the utility of hemodynamic monitorization in the critical patient. Med. Intensiva [online]. 2012, vol.36, n.9, pp.650-655. ISSN 0210-5691. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2012.06.004.
Hemodynamic monitoring is a tool of great value for the assessment of critically ill patients. It can not only detect and determine the source of hemodynamic instability, but also guide the choice of appropriate treatment and further evaluate its effectiveness. However, monitoring per se is not a therapeutic tool and its use in the absence of a well-defined objective, need not affect patient outcome. To improve outcome, hemodynamic monitoring necessarily must be coupled to a treatment protocol that has effectively been shown to improve outcome. Accordingly, the usefulness of monitoring systems should be evaluated not only on the basis of the accuracy and reliability of their measurements, but also on the ability to positively affect patient outcome. In this regard, many of the arguments against the use of hemodynamic monitoring are a consequence of non-protocolized use and of application not directed towards specific hemodynamic objectives of proven benefit for the patient.
Keywords : Hemodynamic monitoring; Critically ill patients.