SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número2Las cinéticas con glucosa hipertónica permiten identificar mejor el fallo de ultrafiltración: ¿Qué aporta el cribado de sodio?Estudio Bahia 2008: barómetro de la hidratación de la población española índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Nefrología (Madrid)

versión On-line ISSN 1989-2284versión impresa ISSN 0211-6995

Resumen

HERNANDEZ JARAS, Julio et al. Does Stewart-Fencl approach improve the evaluation of acid-base status in stable patients on hemodiafiltration?. Nefrología (Madr.) [online]. 2010, vol.30, n.2, pp.214-219. ISSN 1989-2284.

Introduction: The traditional evaluation of acid-base status relies on the Henderson-Hasselbach equation. In 1983, an alternative approach, based on physical and chemical principles was proposed by P. Stewart. In this approach, plasma pH is determined by 3 independent variables: pCO2, Strong Ion Difference (SIDm), which is the difference between the strong cations (Na+, K+, Ca++, Mg++) and the strong anions (Cl-, lactate) and total plasma concentration of nonvolatile weak acids (ATot), mainly inorganic phosphate and albumin. Bicarbonate is considered a dependent variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acid-base status using both perspectives, physical chemical and traditional approach. Material and methods: we studied 35 patients (24 male; 11 female) on hemodiafiltration, mean age was 67.2 ± 15.7, 8 ± 19.2 kg. We analyzed plasma chemistry including pH, pCO2, HCO3-, base excess and Na+, K+, Cl-, Ca++, Mg++, lactate and SIDm. The SID estimated (SIDe) was calculated by Figge's formula (1,000 x 2.46-11 x pCO2/[10 - pH] + Album g/dl x [0.123 x pH -0.631] + P in mmol/l0 x [0.309 x pH -0.469]) and Gap of the SID as the difference SIDm-SIDe. Results: pH preHD was 7.36 ± 0.08 and pH post-HD 7.44 ± 0.08 (p <0.001). There was no significant differences between pCO2 pre- and post-HD. HCO3- and base excess increased during the session (p <0.001). SIDm decreased from 46.2 ± 2.9 pre-HD to 45 ± 2.3 mEq/l post-HD (p <0.05). On the opposite, SIDe increased from 38.5 ± 3.8 to 429 ± 3.1 mEq/l (p <0.001). The Gap Anion descended from 18.6 ± 3.8 pre-HD to 12.8 ± 2.8 mEq/l post-HD (p <0.001) and the Gap of the SID 7.6 ± 3 to 2.1 ± 2 (p <0.001). Anion Gap correlated with the Gap-SID so much pre-HDF as pos-HDF. ∆ Base excess correlated only with ∆ of the Gap SID. Conclusion: Stewart-Fencl's approach does not improve characterization of acid-base status in patients on chronic HDF. In presence of normocloremia the SIDm does not reflect the alkalinizing process of the session of hemodialysis. According this approach, hemodialysis therapy can be viewed as a withdrawal of inorganic anions, especially the sulphate. These anions are replaced by OH- and secondarily for HCO3-. The approach only improves the evaluation of unmeasured anions by the Gap of the SID, without the effect of albumin and phosphate.

Palabras clave : Stewart-Fencl approach; Acidosis; Hemodiafiltration; Gap anion.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons