SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue1Advances in the evaluation of bone health in kidney transplant patientsCorrection of 25-OH-vitamin D deficiency improves control of secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces the inflammation in stable haemodialysis patients author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Nefrología (Madrid)

On-line version ISSN 1989-2284Print version ISSN 0211-6995

Abstract

MADUELL, Francisco et al. Evaluation of the dialyser inner diameter in online haemodiafiltration. Nefrología (Madr.) [online]. 2018, vol.38, n.1, pp.34-40. ISSN 1989-2284.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2017.03.013.

Introduction:

Online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has been associated with increased survival. To date, the influence of the inner diameter of the hollow fibres of the dialyser on convective volume has not been well established. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the inner diameter of the dialyser on the convective volume and removal capacity.

Material and methods:

We included 16 patients in posdilutional OL-HDF with autosubstitution. Each patient was analysed in 4 sessions in which the inner diameter varied; 185 μm (FX60 Cordiax and FX80 Cordiax) versus 210 μm (FX600 Cordiax and FX800 Cordiax). Different solutes were measured at the beginning and end of each dialysis session.

Results:

No differences in the convective volume were found with an increased inner diameter: 32.3 ± 3.1 vs. 31.8 ± 3.6 l/session (FX60 vs. FX600) and 33.7 ± 4.3 vs. 33.5 ± 3.8 l/session (FX80 vs. FX800). The reduction percentages also did not differ: urea 83.7 ± 4.5 vs. 84.1 ± 3.4 for FX60 and FX600, and 82.7 ± 4.1 vs. 83.6 ± 3.8 for FX80 vs. FX800; creatinine similar 78.2 ± 5.6 vs. 77.8 ± 4.6 y 77.1 ± 5.4 vs. 78.1 ± 4.9; β2-microglobulin 82.2 ± 4.3 vs. 82.9 ± 4.2, and 82.9 ± 4.7 vs. 84.0 ± 3.8; myoglobin 71.0 ± 10 vs. 70.2 ± 9 and 72.8 ± 11 vs. 75.0 ± 10; prolactin 70.4 ± 9 vs. 68.1 ± 9, and 72.2 ± 10 vs. 73.4 ± 8.2; and α1-microglobulin 22.9 ± 10 vs. 21.6 ± 10, and 26.5 ± 12 vs. 28.8 ± 11, respectively.

Conclusion:

The increase in the inner diameter of the hollow fibres did not result in improved convective volume and removal capacity.

Keywords : Dialyser; Inner diameter; Online haemodiafiltration; Convective volume.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )