SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue1Analysis of sagittal root classification by cone beam tomography in the premaxilla in a Honduran population: retrospective cross-sectional studyUser satisfaction in public dental services in Abancay - Perú author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Avances en Odontoestomatología

On-line version ISSN 2340-3152Print version ISSN 0213-1285

Abstract

AREVALO VINTIMILLA, PD  and  RODRIGUEZ COYAGO, ML. BRAF V600E mutant ameloblastomas: a systematic review on their clinical and therapeutic management. Av Odontoestomatol [online]. 2025, vol.41, n.1, pp.25-36.  Epub May 12, 2025. ISSN 2340-3152.

The evidence regarding the impact of the BRAFV600E variant on the prognosis of ameloblastoma is, at present, contradictory. Additionally, there are no clinical guidelines that compile the most significant data and direct the clinical procedure when diagnosing this tumor.

Objective:

To determine by systematic review the level of evidence available in terms of the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of BRAFV600E mutant ameloblastomas, delving into the possible benefit of molecular chemotherapy directed at the activating V600E genetic alteration in the BRAF protooncogene, without additional mutations, and in neoadjuvant scheme.

Materials and methods:

Based on the PRISMA guideline, a systematic bibliographic search was carried out in scientific databases of clinical studies published in the last 10 years on the prognostic, diagnosis and treatment of BRAFV600E mutant ameloblastomas.

Results:

The diagnosis of a BRAFV600E ameloblastoma is guided by clinical-radiographic criteria, reinforced with pathological criteria, and confirmed with molecular biology aimed at determining the V600E variant, which, according to strong evidence, is related to greater disease-free survival. Molecularly targeted chemotherapy, with an exclusive BRAF inhibitor, appears to offer a benefit over chemotherapy directed at two molecular targets of the MAPK pathway for recurrent or metastatic cases.

Conclusion:

The clinical and therapeutic management of BRAFV600E mutant ameloblastomas requires a multidisciplinary approach. Treatment with exclusive inhibitor in neoadjuvant therapy demonstrates survival advantages, and is reserved for recurrent or metastatic cases, although the evidence is deficient in quantity and quality.

Keywords : ameloblastoma; BRAFV600E mutated ameloblastoma; diagnosis; prognosis; treatment.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )