SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue2Supporting community participation in a pandemicIncorporating narratives and perceptions into local health diagnoses: the case of Bilbao author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Gaceta Sanitaria

Print version ISSN 0213-9111

Abstract

SERES, Elisabet et al. Evaluation of competences in scientific writing after two different types of training courses: SCRIU-B study protocol. Gac Sanit [online]. 2022, vol.36, n.2, pp.188-192.  Epub Sep 19, 2022. ISSN 0213-9111.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.12.036.

Scientific writing is one of the competences required and requested by health professionals. There are several course formats designed for acquiring these competences, although the improvement after taking part in these courses is not always demonstrated. Through an open and non-randomized experimental design, the SCRIU-B study aims to evaluate the acquisition of competencies in scientific writing after specific training courses (face-to-face and online) as well as the satisfaction of the participants with these courses. A control group with participants from other training workshops not related to scientific writing is included. Through different questionnaires about knowledge, attitudes and skills we will evaluate and compare the improvement of their scientific writing skills. The results of the study will allow us to assess the usefulness of these courses and improve their format and implementation.

Keywords : Experimental design; Continuiing medical education; Clinical trial protocol; Publishing; Medical writing; Personal satisfaction.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )