SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 número1Cirugía del contorno abdominal en el varón. Detalles técnicos a propósito de un caso índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana

versión On-line ISSN 1989-2055versión impresa ISSN 0376-7892

Resumen

BENITO-DUQUE, Pablo et al. Modifications of the reversed sural flap to improve its viability in large defects foot reconstruction. Cir. plást. iberolatinoam. [online]. 2018, vol.44, n.1, pp.65-71.  Epub 08-Feb-2021. ISSN 1989-2055.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0376-78922018000100012.

Background and Objective:

The reverse flow sural flap has won great popularity, but some authors report frequent complications of total or partial flap necrosis.

We present a number of technical modifications to increase the viability of the flap when it is necessary to design it to its fullest extent to cover large defects in the foot.

Methods:

From August 2005 to August 2013, 4 patients underwent the procedure of reverse flow sural flap mega-high flap for foot reconstruction. The flaps ranged from 7 x 17 cm to 15 x 22 cm in size. The average follow-up was 60 months.

The 3 modifications that we usually perform when making this flap are: 1.- The deep fascia is incised and lifted 1.5 cm broader than the skin island. 2.- We keep the width of the adipofascial pedicle as wide as possible. 3.- We habitually suture later on after the first procedure the flap, allowing the edema to expand.

Results:

No partial or total necrosis was neither observed, nor other postoperative complications. All the flaps allowed the reconstruction of the defects, without needing other complementary flaps.

Conclusions:

We believe that the extent of the defects and their successful reconstruction with this type of megaflap, in which we have applied the changes described, justifies the presentation of our experience. However, we note that the 4 patients had no vascular risk conditions, in which it would be advisable to delay the flap or select other reconstructive techniques.

Palabras clave : Lower extremity; Foot reconstruction; Sural flap.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )