SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 número3Osteomielitis costal múltiple tras mamoplastia de aumento. Caso clínico índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana

versión On-line ISSN 1989-2055versión impresa ISSN 0376-7892

Resumen

GUARIN, David Enrique; VICTORIA, Fabian Efrén; ARIAS, Jaime Roberto  y  FERNANDEZ LOPEZ, Daniel Fernando. Breast implant displacement, a review of literature and classification proposal. Cir. plást. iberolatinoam. [online]. 2021, vol.47, n.3, pp.239-246.  Epub 01-Nov-2021. ISSN 1989-2055.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0376-78922021000300003.

Background and objective.

Complications related to implant-based breast surgery are a potential safety issue due to its high incidence. Implant displacement is one of these complications that has been associated to frequent revision surgery. However, there is a lack of information about the characteristics and epidemiology of this condition.

The aim of this study is to research in the scientific literature and propose a displacement classification.

Methods.

A literature review was done by using the keywords: Implant displacement, complications and breast implants, looking for publications about complications in breast surgery including implant displacement and the associated factors.

Results.

We found 186 publications of which 8 were included, with a total of 29.917 patients, age ranged from 14 to 77 and a follow up time from 0.1 to 34 years; 97.55% were silicone implants, 1% saline and 1% with no information. The smooth surface was used in 19.01% and textured in 79.63%. Subglandular approach was used from 5.7% to 73.3% of the cases, subpectoral from 5.4% to 80%, subfascial plane was used in 725 subjects in 1 study, and dual plane was used in 2 studies with 16.7% and 56.6%. Implant size was reported from 50 up to 800 cc. The reported displacement was between 0.3 up to 16.6% with a mean of 5.26%

Conclusions.

There is heterogeneity in the diagnosis and the reported outcomes, and a lack of a standard definition and diagnosis of the displacement. Implant displacement has been accused of being one of the first causes for revision in breast surgery, however, there is a lack of clinical studies that estimate the frequency of presentation and the related factors. A classification tool to assess the displacement is critical to standardize the outcomes and improve the quality of the studies.

Palabras clave : Implant displacement; Complications; Breast implants.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )