Objective:

To compare profiles of patients suffering mild to severe pain treated with orodispersible formulation of paracetamol 325 mg/tramadol HCL 37,5mg (Paxiflas®) in comparison with other oral formulations of paracetamol 325 mg/tramadol HCL 37,5mg. In addition, to compare adherence, satisfaction and preference between groups.

Materials and methods:

Propax is a postautorization, observational, cross-sectional retrospective and multicentre study. The primary variable was the clinic and sociodemographic profile of the patient. Patient satisfaction was measured by STAMED generic questionnaire; adherence was measured by Morisky-Green questionnaire and preference was measured using a battery of questions with Likert-like answer.

Results:

A number 835 patients were evaluated. Clinical and sociodemographic statistically significant differences were not observed between both groups of patients. However, there were statistically significant differences among Paxiflas® group of patients in satisfaction assessment, in both total score (p = 0,002) and dimensions: side effects interferences in everyday life (p = 0,006), convenience and ease of use (p < 0,001) and overall opinion of medication and health condition (p = 0,010). In addition, patient preference of Paxiflas® over other oral combinations of tramadol HCI (37.5 mg) and paracetamol (325 mg) was statistically significant (p < 0,001), including perception of pain relief speed, medication convenience, taste and likeable sensation, tablet size convenience and final election of treatment.

Conclusions:

Statistically significant differences were not observed in neither patient profile nor adherence. Paxiflas® orodispersible tablets demonstrated to provide greater satisfaction and preference among patients suffering acute and mild chronic musculoskeletal pain than other oral formulations.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )