SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 número4La escala de Norton modificada por el INSALUD y sus diferencias en la práctica clínicaÚlcera por presión en talón, en paciente frágil multirresistente a antibióticos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Gerokomos

versión impresa ISSN 1134-928X

Resumen

ROA DIAZ, Zayne Milena; PARRA, Dora Inés  y  CAMARGO-FIGUERA, Fabio Alberto. Validity and Quality indices of Braden and Norton scales. Gerokomos [online]. 2017, vol.28, n.4, pp.200-204. ISSN 1134-928X.

Aim:

To determine the construct and criterion validity, quality indices of sensitivity, specificity and efficiency of the Braden and Norton Scales in adult patients hospitalized.

Methods:

Validation of diagnostic technologies nested in a prospective cohort. Inclusion criteria: be 18 years old or older and do not have pressure ulcer at admission. Criterion validity was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, quality indices and AUC, relative risk.

Results:

938 people tested, 5.1% (95% CI 3.6 - 6.4) had at least one pressure ulcer. It was calculated for the cutoffs ≤18 Braden and ≤17 Norton sensitivities of 89.8 and 83.7% and quality indices of 0.82 and 0.77, respectively; quality indices of specificity showed values below 0.20.

Conclusion:

The Braden scale presented a better balance in its psychometric properties for individual risk assessment of developing UPP; however, the quality indices for the specificity of both scales reveal poor performance.

Palabras clave : risk assessment scales; Braden Scale; Norton Scale; pressure ulcers; validity.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )