Mi SciELO
Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
Citado por SciELO
Accesos
Links relacionados
Citado por Google
Similares en
SciELO
Similares en Google
Compartir
Gerokomos
versión impresa ISSN 1134-928X
Resumen
IBARS-MONCASI, Pilar et al. Comparative study between two moist wound healing dressings in closed surgical wound. Gerokomos [online]. 2025, vol.36, n.1, pp.50-56. Epub 05-Mayo-2025. ISSN 1134-928X. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s1134-928x2025000100009.
Background:
Complications of surgical wounds such as suture dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, and infection can negatively affect the healing process. Moist wound healing (MWH) can prevent these complications; its effects on the wound include a shorter inflammatory phase, a greater proliferation of cells essential for healing, collagen synthesis and stimulation of angiogenesis, among others.
Objective:
To assess the efficacy of 2 types of MWH dressings in patients undergoing obstetric surgery, specifically caesarean sections.
Methodology:
Comparative study carried out in the Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital in Lleida, with 68 patients, divided into 2 groups according to the type of dressing used: dressing A (Allevyn® Gentle Border) and dressing B (Biatain® Silicone). The variables evaluated were dressing adherence, absorption capacity, perilesional skin condition, pain and surgical site complications. Results: The analysis of the results did not find significant differences for any of the variables and characteristics of the dressings. Most patients did not experience complications at the surgical site.
Conclusions:
We confirmed that the two dressings have very similar clinical performance, meet the requirements and specifications to adequately perform their function; and were shown to be effective in preventing surgical wound complications in patients undergoing cesarean sections.
Palabras clave : Comparative study; dressing; wound healing; surgical wound; cesarean section; surgical wound dehiscence; surgical wound infection.












