SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue37Commentaries on the Spanish Law 34/2003 (2): Evaluation of the psychiatric chartAtypical gunshot wound with 9 mm Luger KPO ammunition author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Cuadernos de Medicina Forense

On-line version ISSN 1988-611XPrint version ISSN 1135-7606

Abstract

ORTEGA PEREZ, A.. Does ignoring the single umbilical artery have so much importance?: Commentaries concerning a judicial sentence. Cuad. med. forense [online]. 2004, n.37, pp.31-35. ISSN 1988-611X.

The Spanish Supreme Court has condemned several obstetricians after having informed that the umbilical cord of a fetus had the three vessels, therefore deactivating the search for fetal diseases that the single umbilical artery (SUA) would have provoked. The sentence will be ethically correct only if SUA is really associated with such diseases. SUA is found in about 1 out of every 320 fetuses studied sonographically. In 68% of them, it will be an isolated finding, although it will increase the risks of premature delivery, low birthweight, and perinatal mortality. On the other hand, 17% of these fetuses will have, besides SUA, chromosomal alterations, and 31 % of them, structural malformations. In conclusion, SUA is an important marker of fetal disorders, and it has to be actively searched for during the ultrasonographic monitoring of the gestation.

Keywords : Chromosomal defects; diagnosis; ethics; gestation; legislation; obstetrics; risk marker; single umbilical artery; structural malformations; ultrasonography.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License