SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 issue2Local perception of access to health services in rural areas. The case of the Navarrese PyreneesRole of sCD40L in the prediction of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra

Print version ISSN 1137-6627

Abstract

RUIZ-MIRALLES, ML et al. Design and validation of the Complex Case Evaluation Index, an instrument to identify complex patients. Anales Sis San Navarra [online]. 2021, vol.44, n.2, pp.195-204.  Epub Feb 07, 2022. ISSN 1137-6627.  https://dx.doi.org/10.23938/assn.0946.

Background

The aim was to develop and validate the Complex Case Assessment Index (CCAI), a specific instrument to identify complex patients.

Methods.

Instrumental study in two phases: 1) Development of the scale: the variables extracted from the literature were firstly defined and operationalized, and then submitted for expert judgment. The CCAI included 14 variables divided into two dimensions: complexity of clinical management and complexity of community management. 2) Psychometric study: evaluation of the reliability and validity of the scale by equivalence between observers (Pearson's r), criterion validity with respect to the Clinical Risk Groups (CRG) classification system, and construct validity through known groups and study of hierarchical clusters were examined. The analyses were carried out with the SPSS version 17 statistical package.

Results

Reliability by equivalence between observers was r = 0.97 for the clinical subscale, r = 0.74 for the community subscale, and r = 0.89 for the total score. The CCAI identified 518 cases as complex; 458 of them (88.4%) were categorized by the CRG system in the categories of greatest clinical complexity (levels 6 to 9). The results support the construct validity of the scale. The cluster analysis showed two different, although related, clusters.

Conclusion

The CCAI is a fast and easy-to-use index, with good conceptual adequacy and evidence of reliability and validity for screening patients with complex needs.

Keywords : Chronic disease; Comorbidity; Patient complexity; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of results.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )