SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16 issue64Clinical ultrasound: a diagnostic test or a part of the routine exam?Tackling child overweight in Primary Care: the role of motivational interviewing author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Pediatría Atención Primaria

Print version ISSN 1139-7632

Abstract

MOLINA ARIAS, M.. The problem of multiple comparisons. Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria [online]. 2014, vol.16, n.64, pp.367-370. ISSN 1139-7632.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1139-76322014000500019.

Clinical trials are designed to respond to a well-defined clinical question. However, in many cases, especially if the results are not significant, studies after the test design are established to try obtaining some positive results. Comparisons between subgroups based on nonrandomized characteristics to find a statistically significant result are well established. The problem of multiple comparisons is the increased likelihood of false positives and committing type I errors. For this reason, all the results obtained from the comparison of subgroups formed after randomization should be critically analyzed.

Keywords : Multiple comparisons; Type I error; Post hoc analysis; Bonferroni correction.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License