SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 issue3Measuring the proportion of time spent on work activities of clinical pharmacists using work sampling technique at a public hospital in MalaysiaPharmacists' roles in mental healthcare: past, present and future author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Pharmacy Practice (Granada)

On-line version ISSN 1886-3655Print version ISSN 1885-642X

Abstract

DEEP, Louise et al. Pharmacy student-assisted medication reconciliation: Number and types of medication discrepancies identified by pharmacy students. Pharmacy Pract (Granada) [online]. 2021, vol.19, n.3, 2471.  Epub Sep 27, 2021. ISSN 1886-3655.  https://dx.doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2021.3.2471.

Background:

Medication reconciliation aims to prevent unintentional medication discrepancies that can result in patient harm at transitions of care. Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation has clear benefits, however workforce limitations can be a barrier to providing this service. Pharmacy students are a potential workforce solution.

Objective:

To evaluate the number and type of medication discrepancies identified by pharmacy students.

Methods:

Fourth year pharmacy students completed best possible medication histories and identified discrepancies with prescribed medications for patients admitted to hospital. A retrospective audit was conducted to determine the number and type of medication discrepancies identified by pharmacy students, types of patients and medicines involved in discrepancies.

Results:

There were 294 patients included in the study. Overall, 72% (n=212/294) had medication discrepancies, the most common type being drug omission. A total of 645 discrepancies were identified, which was a median of three per patient. Patients with discrepancies were older than patients without discrepancies with a median (IQR) age of 74 (65-84) vs 68 (53-77) years (p=0.001). They also took more medicines with a median (IQR) number of 9 (6-3) vs 7 (2-10) medicines per patient (p<0.001). The most common types of medicines involved were those related to the alimentary tract and cardiovascular system.

Conclusions:

Pharmacy students identified medication discrepancies in over 70% of hospital inpatients, categorised primarily as drug omission. Pharmacy students can provide a beneficial service to the hospital and contribute to improved patient safety by assisting pharmacists with medication reconciliation.

Keywords : Medication Reconciliation; Students, Pharmacy; Professional Competence; Pharmaceutical Services; Medical History Taking; Hospitalization; Pharmacists; Workforce; Cross-Sectional Studies; Australia.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )