SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número54El consentimiento informado como un continuo narrativoConsideraciones éticas sobre CRISPR/Cas9: uso terapéutico en embriones y futura gobernabilidad índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista de Bioética y Derecho

versão On-line ISSN 1886-5887

Resumo

REDONDO-GARCIA, Antonio. The 14-day rule under debate: a critical analysis from Bioethics. Rev. Bioética y Derecho [online]. 2022, n.54, pp.103-119.  Epub 12-Dez-2022. ISSN 1886-5887.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1344/rbd2021.54.35556.

The aim of this article is to critically analyze the arguments used in defense of the 14-day rule, which refers to research and experimentation with human embryos. This rule was first proposed more than forty years ago, and many countries have adopted it and included it in their respective legislation. However, after four decades, science today demands an international debate in which the limit imposed by the rule is urgently reviewed, which makes it impossible for scientists to be able to investigate with embryos created in the laboratory beyond the 14 days limit. To this end, we will examine two fundamental texts in which the rule originated, analyzing from bioethics whether the arguments contained in them are coherent and whether they can currently be sustained. In addition, we will consider to the reasons offered by science for its extension, bearing in mind that any change in the rule must always correspond to the values present in society at the time.

Palavras-chave : 14-day rule; embryo; human being; potentiality; gastrulation; bioethics.

        · resumo em Espanhol | Catalão     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )