SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue54The 14-day rule under debate: a critical analysis from BioethicsDegree of information perceived by legal guardians in the Informed Consent of challenge tests in Pediatric Allergy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Bioética y Derecho

On-line version ISSN 1886-5887

Abstract

AYELEN-FERREYRA, Karen. Ethical considerations on CRISPR/Cas9: therapeutic use in embryos and future governance. Rev. Bioética y Derecho [online]. 2022, n.54, pp.121-138.  Epub Dec 12, 2022. ISSN 1886-5887.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1344/rbd2021.54.36115.

The CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technique has made a revolution in science and has also generated discussions about its use in humans, both at the safety, ethical and political levels. In this paper, I argue that it is not possible to perform gene editing for therapeutic use of the CRISPR-Cas9 technique in embryos with monogenic diseases that will become future children until greater safety and efficacy are guaranteed. To this end, I consider that there must be a balance between prevention in its therapeutic use and its use in research. First, I explain the different possible uses of the CRISPR-Cas9 technique, differentiating its therapeutic use (validated practice and non-validated practice), its use for improvement and its use in research. Secondly, I analyze the risks of performing gene editing for therapeutic use. In addition, I list a series of ethical considerations to be considered in the future in case this technique is approved. Thirdly, I evaluate the international consensus reached so far and describe the case of Argentina, its prohibition and the problems it generates at the time of doing research. Fourthly, I analyze the different existing reproductive alternatives and perform a risk/benefit analysis for their possible use. Finally, I evaluate a possible objection to my work by explaining that it does not contemplate the reproductive freedom of prospective parents. In response, I consider that a conflict between the principles of autonomy and non-maleficence is generated.

Keywords : CRISPR-Cas9; therapeutic use; single-gene diseases; risks; global consensus; future children.

        · abstract in Spanish | Catalan     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )