SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue2Graduate profile of the Nutritionist in Chile: similarities and particularities between the different institutions of Higher EducationChanges in the modality of nutritional care of hospitalized patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. A descriptive study in health establishment in Argentina author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética

On-line version ISSN 2174-5145Print version ISSN 2173-1292

Abstract

LOZANO-CASANOVA, Mar et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in a university population: differences between faculty, administrative staff and students. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet [online]. 2023, vol.27, n.2, pp.135-143.  Epub Mar 04, 2024. ISSN 2174-5145.  https://dx.doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.27.2.1895.

Introduction:

Globally, 31% of deaths are attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD). There are many factors that can influence CVD that can be useful for determining if a population is at risk; these factors include stress, occupation, and lifestyle. Objective: to identify and compare the prevalence of CVD risk factors among those attending a university clinic for nutritional advice.

Methodology:

The sample of this cross-sectional study included the teaching and research staff (Faculty), people working in administration and services (ASS) and students. The risk factors of obesity/overweight, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes type 2, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking were quantified for 98 university students, faculty and staff.

Results:

It was found that 80% of the sample had one or more of the CVD risks, furthermore, more than 50% had over three of the risk factors. Those particularly at risk were the individuals within the Faculty group with a (p<0.05) prevalence of having three of the risk components compared to the rest of the population. However, those within the ASS group were identified to live a more sedentary lifestyle compared to the Faculty (p<0.05). Within this sample population differences could be found for the prevalence of CVD risk factors.

Conclusions:

To be able to provide preventative measures and protect those who are most vulnerable it is crucial to be able to pinpoint these differences within a population.

Funding:

M. Lozano-Casanova are supported by a FPU grant number: FPU21/04232 by the Ministerio de Universidades.

Keywords : Faculty; Student Health; Heart Disease Risk Factors; University Population.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )