SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue6Sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older women, determined by different diagnostic methodsTwenty-five years of duodenal switch. How to switch to the duodenal switch author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

My SciELO

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Nutrición Hospitalaria

On-line version ISSN 1699-5198Print version ISSN 0212-1611

Nutr. Hosp. vol.36 n.6 Madrid Nov./Dec. 2019  Epub Feb 24, 2020

https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.02690 

Trabajos Originales

Consistencies and terminologies – the use of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative

Consistencias y terminologías: el uso de la Iniciativa Internacional de Estandarización de la Dieta para la Disfagia

Alessandra Salles Machado1  , Cynthia Hellene dos Santos Moreira2  , Deuzi Caetano da Silva Vimercati2  , Tiago Costa Pereira1  , Denise Coutinho Endringer3 

1Speech Therapist and Professor. Universidade Vila Velha. Espírito Santo, Brazil.

2Speech Therapist, Universidade Vila Velha. Espírito Santo, Brazil.

3Pharmacist and Professor. Universidade Vila Velha. Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Abstract

Introduction:

this study aimed to verify the ability of speech therapists to identify, sort and name the different consistencies used in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia (NOD) management, and to compare the results with the terms proposed by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI).

Methods:

this research was approved by the ethics committee. Sixty speech therapists who work with NOD patients sorted 5 commercial foods from thinnest to thickest to match IDDSI levels 0 to 4, and then used a term to designate each consistency.

Results:

most subjects (76.66%) sorted the foods properly. Terminologies were divergent at all levels. For level 0, practitioners assigned 3 different terms. For level 1, 24 different terms were reported; for level 2 there were 25 terms, 23 terms for level 3, and 18 terms for level 4. Level 0 (IDDSI - thin) was designated by most participants as liquid; level 1 (IDDSI - slightly thick) was referred to as semi-thickened liquid; level 2 (IDDSI - mildly thick) as thickened liquid; level 3 (IDDSI - moderately thick) as honey; and level 4 (IDDSI - extremely thick) as pasty by most subjects. A reduced number of participants used terms in accordance with IDDSI. Level 0 was appropriately named by 5 subjects (8.33%); levels 1, 2 and 4 by 2 practitioners each (3.33%); and level 3 by 1 professional (1.66%). None of the subjects named all 5 IDDSI levels correctly.

Conclusion:

most practitioners progressed consistencies properly. There was a diversity of terminologies used for the same consistency at all levels, with no standardization.

Key words: Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Terminology; Viscosity; Speech therapy

Resumen

Introducción:

este estudio tuvo como objetivo verificar la capacidad de los logopedas para identificar, clasificar y nombrar las diferentes consistencias utilizadas en el manejo de la disfagia orofaríngea neurogénica (NOD) y comparar los resultados con los términos propuestos por la Iniciativa Internacional de Estandarización de la Dieta para la Disfagia (IDDSI).

Métodos:

esta investigación fue aprobada por el comité de ética. Sesenta terapeutas del habla que trabajan con pacientes de NOD clasificaron 5 alimentos comerciales, desde los más finos hasta los más gruesos, coincidiendo con los niveles 0 a 4 de la IDDSI; luego, debían nombrar cada consistencia.

Resultados:

la mayoría de los sujetos (76,66%) clasificaron correctamente las consistencias. Las terminologías fueron divergentes en todos los niveles. Para el nivel 0, los participantes asignaron 3 términos diferentes. Para el nivel 1 usaron 24 términos diferentes, 25 términos para el nivel 2, 23 para el nivel 3 y 18 para el nivel 4. La consistencia del nivel 0 (IDDSI fina) fue nombrada por la mayoría de los participantes como líquida; la del nivel 1 (IDDSI ligeramente espesa) la denominaron líquida semi-espesada; la del nivel 2 (IDDSI poco espesa) como líquida espesada; la del nivel 3 (IDDSI moderadamente espesa) como miel, y la del nivel 4 (IDDSI extremadamente espesa) como pastosa. Un número reducido de participantes emplearon términos coincidentes con los de la IDDSI. El nivel 0 fue nombrado correctamente por 5 sujetos (8,33%), los niveles 1, 2 y 4 por 2 participantes cada uno (3,33%), y el nivel 3 por 1 profesional (1,66%). Ninguno de los sujetos nombró correctamente los 5 niveles de la IDDSI.

Conclusión:

la mayoría de los participantes ordenaron correctamente la progresión de las consistencias. Hubo diversidad en las terminologías utilizadas para una misma consistencia en todos los niveles, sin estandarización alguna.

Palabras clave: Deglución; Trastornos de la deglución; Terminología; Viscosidad; Terapia del habla

INTRODUCTION

Swallowing is a complex process that depends on the integrity of various physical structures and aims to transport food from the oral cavity to the stomach without penetration into the airways (1). Any change that hinders swallowing safety and efficiency is classified as dysphagia, recognized by the World Health Organization within the symptoms related to the digestive system (1 2-3). In the general population, the prevalence of neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia (NOD) varies from 2% to 16%, with values above 40% in hospitalized patients (2 3-4). Although it may occur at any age, the highest prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia is found in the elderly, where it may be permanent or transient (4). Risk factors include use of medications, tracheostomy, previous orotracheal intubation, head and neck surgery, and neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, neurodegenerative diseases, and stroke (5,6). Dysphagia, regardless of etiology, leads to severe consequences such as malnutrition, significant weight loss, aspirative pneumonia, and mortality (6,7).

Speech therapy aims to minimize the complications of OD and includes the definition of a safe feeding path (8), as well as the modification of food characteristics such as texture and consistency (9,10). Liquids are associated with laryngeal penetration (11), and to promote safe and efficient swallowing homogeneous and thick diets are recommended (9). Thickened beverages compensate deficits and reduce aspiration risk (2,3,12 13 14 15-16). However, increased viscosity renders oral and pharyngeal transit longer (2,9), increases the risk for food residues (2,10,15), and demands greater tongue pressure when swallowing (2,10,17). Liquids must be thickened to a specific viscosity to improve swallowing safety for each patient, since very thin liquids can be as detrimental as excessively thickened ones (18) and a correct selection depends on evaluation findings (19).

Currently, it is understood that a standardization of terminology to identify consistencies is relevant to guarantee the efficiency of treatment (3,20 21-22). Internationally, several standardized terminologies are used (23 24 25-26), most commonly the National Dysphagia Diet (NDD) (27) and International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) (28). The NDD was published in 2002 by the American Dietetic Association in order to establish a standard terminology and the practical applications of dietary texture modification for dysphagia; it includes 4 levels for liquid foods (27). The IDDSI was proposed in 2016 with the aim of developing a globally standardized terminology to describe food consistencies as used for individuals with dysphagia. It includes 8 consistency levels and proposes simple methods of measuring consistency using a syringe, fork and spoon (28).

Lack of standardization in consistency nomenclature generates risks to the patient (3,20,29). The viscosity of thickened liquids is often judged subjectively and described using terms such as syrup and honey (29). Prescriptions involving viscosity and texture should allow efficient communication between professionals (3,20,29).

Speech therapists ought to know and use a standard viscosity nomenclature, otherwise their practice may generate risks to their patients. Accordingly, the present study aims to assess the ability of speech therapists to identify, sort, and name the different consistencies used in NOD management, and to compare the results with the terms proposed by the Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI).

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study. It was approved by the institution’s Ethics Committee (2.490.627). The sample consisted of speech therapists who work with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia (NOD) patients. These professionals were contacted by e-mail, by phone and in person. A total of 114 participants were contacted and invited, and 65 accepted to take part. As inclusion criteria for this study, the participants had to work with NOD patients. Participants who would not fill out the questionnaire or who later stated that they did not exactly work with NOD patients were excluded.

Data were collected at their workplace. The participants were informed of the study’s aims and provided a signed consent to participate. The questionnaire assessed sample characteristics such as age, gender, work with NOD patients or otherwise, timing of professional activity with dysphagia, workplace, and population served.

The sorting and naming tasks were initially explained to each participant, and the 5 foods presented simultaneously in small portions arranged in colored disposable cups, but not in increasing or decreasing order of consistency. The participants were instructed to sort these foods from thinnest to thickest viscosity, and to write in blank spaces the terms they would use to describe the consistencies presented. The materials available to participants were watercolor pens (green, blue, purple, grey, and pink), a 10 mL syringe without needle or plunger, a stopwatch, spoons and forks. Participants were allowed to manipulate the samples if they wanted to. Five levels were considered, from 0 to 4. To ensure consistent presentation of same viscosities, only industrial products were used. These were: mate tea (Chá Mate Leão®) for level 0; mango juice (Summer Fruit®) for level 1; strawberry-flavored yogurt (Itambé®) for level 2; chocolate syrup (Ice Cream®) for level 3; and strawberry-flavored yogurt (Danoninho®) for level 4. Each beverage was previously assigned a level using the IDDSI method with a syringe and stopwatch (30). After completing the questionnaire participants received an IDDSI primer in order to encourage the use of IDDSI standardization in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Sixty-five questionnaires were analyzed to characterize the sample. A total of 5 participants were excluded because they did not work with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia. The sample, therefore, was composed of 60 participants. From this total, 33 (55%) participants reported they worked with NOD patients, and 27 (45%) mentioned they worked with both NOD and mechanic oropharyngeal dysphagia patients. Ages varied from 21 to 54 years, with an average of 33.8 years. They were mostly female therapists – 56 (93.3%), whereas 4 (6.6%) were male. The duration of their practicing with NOD patients varied from 1 month to 20 years, with an average of 5 years and 4 months. A higher concentration of participants was observed between 3 and 4 years of practice (31.66%). Most of them (48.33%) worked only in one workplace, 45.07% in two workplaces, and 6.60% in three workplaces.

Home care was the main workplace described (61.66%), followed by hospitals (48.33%). The population served varied, but the greatest demand was in the care of elderly individuals (73.33%).

There were no difficulties in identifying the viscosity for level 0. Most speech therapists (76.66%) identified and sorted the consistencies from 0 to 4, from thinnest to thickest, correctly.

Table I shows the viscosity sorting data, from thinnest to thickest. Most participants (49, 81.66%) properly sorted levels 1 and 2. Levels 3 and 4 were sorted properly by 57 (95%). It is important to notice that the number of incorrect sortings decreased as consistency level increased.

Table I. Analysis of the sorting of food consistencies from thinnest to thickest 

Table II lists the terminologies used to describe food viscosity. Concerning the terminology used by speech therapists, there was agreement between 45 participants (75%) on the terminology used to designate level 0. For level 1, 24 different terms were presented; for level 2 there were 25 terms; for level 3 there were 23 terms; and for level 4 the participants used 18 terms. In the analysis, the terminologies used were grouped together based on similarity, as shown intable II. The findings show that different terminologies are used to describe the same viscosity.

Table II. Terminologies used for food consistencies 

Level 0 (IDDSI - thin) was named by most participants as liquid; level 1 (IDDSI - slightly thick) was referred to as semi-thickened liquid; level 2 (IDDSI - mildly thick) was described as thickened liquid; level 3 (IDDSI - moderately thick or liquidized) was named as honey, and level 4 (IDDSI - extremely thick or puréed) was termed pasty by most subjects. A reduced number of participants used terms in accordance to IDDSI – level 0 by 5 subjects (8.33%); levels 1, 2 and 4 by 2 professionals each (3.33%); and level 3 by 1 therapist alone (1.66%). None of the subjects named all 5 IDDSI levels correctly.

DISCUSSION

Regarding the characterization of the sample, the results indicate that most speech therapists (61.66%) worked in home care. Home care was incorporated in Brazil in the 1980s, its guidelines focused on health promotion, conservation and rehabilitation in order to guarantee the health of the population (31). The inclusion of speech-language therapists in home care services is still recent, which explains the shortage of computations aimed at measuring the performance of these professionals (32).

In relation to the population served, the greatest demand for speech therapists is in the care of the elderly (73.33%). Researchers have pointed out that the older the age, the higher the incidence of dysphagia (7). Some studies conclude that it may be associated with anatomical and physiological modifications that promote the risk of disorders in the swallowing process (10). It is important also to consider the increase in this segment of the population, since the number of elderly people is about to exceed the number of people under five years of age (31). As the proportion of elderly people is increasing throughout the country, the high demand of speech therapists for health services is justified (33,34).

When analyzing the ability to sort the presented consistencies, most of the subjects performed the food progression properly, from thinnest to thickest. It was possible to infer that food visualization side by side facilitated sorting the food viscosity. A correct food viscosity identification is extremely relevant as it allows professionals to select the appropriate level to be used in each case (23).

Regarding the terminologies used by the speech therapists, the present study found a great diversity among the participants. Divergence in nomenclature could be seen at all levels, especially at level 2, which collected 25 different terms. The absence of standardization to guide both the preparation and naming of food consistencies results in a variety of nomenclatures in clinical practice (3,20,21,29), whereas a unified terminology provides patient safety and treatment efficiency (3,20,22). It is described in the literature that different consistencies result in crucial changes in the physiology of swallowing, such as reduced risk for aspiration (2,3,12-16). However, they may interfere with oral and pharyngeal transit time (2,9), and may be associated with food stasis (2,9,15) and with changes in the tongue force required for ejection of the bolus (2,10,17).

Diversity in terminology may make it difficult for other professionals, patients, or caregivers to understand and obtain the desired consistence. The extant lack of agreement in nomenclature among professionals, as evidenced by this research, may lead to different interpretations of food consistency prescriptions and to health damage for patients (3,20,29).

The modification of food characteristics such as texture and consistency (9,10) is one of the responsibilities of speech therapists in dysphagia rehabilitation, and a proper use of the available terminology is essential for professionals in this setting. Due to the diversity of terms found in this research, we supposed that most of the professionals participating in the study were unaware of IDDSI.

CONCLUSIONS

The professionals who took part in the study were assertive in sorting the progression of food from thinnest to thickest. The research evidenced the diversity of terminologies that speech therapists working with neurologic oropharyngeal dysphagia patients currently use. In clinical practice this fact represents a risk for patients, since it could lead to misunderstandings and errors in communication between professionals, patients and caregivers, to wrong or incomplete prescriptions, and to incorrect management of food consistency. Comparing the nomenclature proposed by IDDSI with those used by our professionals, there was disagreement between them. The study presented limitations due to the reduced number of participants. Therefore, it highlights the need for further research, aiming to check out the use of a unified terminology.

REFERENCES

1. Resende P, Dobelin J, Oliveira I, Luchesi K. Disfagia orofaríngea neurogênica: análise de protocolos de videofluoroscopia brasileiros e norte-americanos. Rev CEFAC 2015;17(5):1610-9. DOI:10.1590/1982-021620151754315. [ Links ]

2. Newman R, Vilardell N, Speyer R. Effect of bolus viscosity on the safety and efficacy of swallowing and the kinematics of the swallow response in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia:white paper by the european society for swallowing disorders (ESSD). Dysphagia 2016;31:232-49. DOI:10.1007/s00455-016-9696-8. [ Links ]

3. Cichero JAY, Steele C, Duivestein J, ClavéP, Kayashita J, Dantas R, et al. The need for international terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and thickened liquids used in Dysphagia management: Foundations of a Global Initiative. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Reports 2013;1:280-91. DOI:10.1007/s40141-013-0024-z. [ Links ]

4. Andrade P, Santos C, Firmino H, Rosa C. Importancia do rastreamento de disfagia e da avaliação nutricional em pacientes hospitalizados. Inst Isr Ensino e Pesqui Albert Einstein 2018;16(2):1-6. [ Links ]

5. Paiva K, Xavier I, FariaS N. Aging and dysphagia:a public health issue. J Againg Innov [Internet]. 2013;Available from: http://journalofagingandinnovation.org/pt/tag/epidemiologia-da-disfagia/Links ]

6. Jotz GP, De Angelis E. Definição de disfagia. Incidência e prevalência –passado, presente e futuro. In: Disfagia: Abordagem clínica e cirúrgica - criança, adulto e idoso. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier;2017. 1-4. [ Links ]

7. Alves ICF, Andrade CRF de. Mudança funcional no padrão de deglutição por meio da realização de exercícios orofaciais. CoDAS [Internet] 2017;29(3). Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822017000300308&lng=pt&tlng=pt. DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20172016088. [ Links ]

8. Inaoka C, Albuquerque C. Efetividade da intervenção fonoaudiológica na progressão da alimentação via oral em pacientes com disfagia orofaríngea pós AVE. Rev CEFAC 2014;16(1):187-96. DOI:10.1590/1982-0216201413112. [ Links ]

9. Silva R, Luchesi K, Furkim A. Programas de intervenção fonoaudiológica para disfagia orofaríngea neurogênica em adultos. In:Manual prático de disfagia diagnostico e tratamento. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro:Revinter;2017. 279-93. [ Links ]

10. Dornelles S, Jotz GP, Swartz K, Rozenfeld M. Distúrbios da deglutição no adulto e no idoso. In:Disfagia: Abordagem clínica e cirúrgica - criança, adulto e idoso. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro:Elsevier;2017. 129-58. [ Links ]

11. Pires E, Sassi F, Mangilli L, Limongi S, Andrade C. Alimentos na consistência líquida e deglutição: uma revisão crítica de literatura. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2012;17(4):482-8. DOI:10.1590/S1516-80342012000400020. [ Links ]

12. Queiroz C, Barros S, Borgo H, Marino V, Dutka J. Viscosidade e qualidade da imagem do líquido espessado para videofluoroscopia de deglutição com acréscimo do contraste de bário. Rev CEFAC 2015;17(3):873-89. DOI:10.1590/1982-021620155614. [ Links ]

13. Choi K, Ryu J, Kim M, Kang J, Yoo S. Kinematic analysis of Dysphagia: significant parameters of aspiration related to bolus viscosity. Dysphagia 2011;26:392-8. DOI:10.1007/s00455-011-9325-5. [ Links ]

14. Clavé P, Kraa M, Arreola V, Girvent M, Farré R, Palomera E, et al. The effect of bolus viscosity on swallowing function in neurogenic Dysphagia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:1385-94. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03118.x. [ Links ]

15. Hind J, Divyak E, Zielinski J, Taylor A, Hartman M, Gangnon R, et al. Comparison of standardized bariums with varying rheological parameters on swallowing kinematics in males. Rehabil Res Dev 2012;49(9):1399-404. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.09.0180. [ Links ]

16. Leonard R, White C, Mckenzie S, Belafsky P. Effects of bolus rheology on aspiration in patients with dysphagia. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014;114(4):590-4. DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.037. [ Links ]

17. Steele CM, Molfenter SM, Péladeau-Pigeon M, Polacco RC, Yee C. Variations in tongue-palate swallowing pressures when swallowing xanthan gum-thickened liquids. Dysphagia [Internet] 2014;29(6):678-84. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00455-014-9561-6. DOI:10.1007/s00455-014-9561-6. [ Links ]

18. Garcia JM, Chambers E, Matta Z, Clark M. Viscosity measurements of nectar- and honey-thick liquids: product, liquid, and time comparisons. Dysphagia 2005;20:325-35. DOI:10.1007/s00455-005-0034-9. [ Links ]

19. Garin N, De Pourcq JT, Cardona D, Martín-Venegas R, Gich I, Cardenete J, et al. Cambios en la viscosidad del agua con espesantes por la adición de fármacos altamente prescritos en geriatría. Nutr Hosp [Internet] 2012;27(4):1298-303. Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112012000400049&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es. [ Links ]

20. Amaral ACF, Rodrigues LA, Furlan RMMM, Vicente LCC, Motta AR. Fonoaudiologia e nutrição em ambiente hospitalar: análise de terminologia de classificação das consistências alimentares. CoDAS [Internet] 2015;27(6):541-9. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822015000600541&lng=pt&tlng=pt. DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20152015059. [ Links ]

21. Steele CM, Alsanei WA, Ayanikalath S, Barbon CEA, Chen J, Cichero JAY, et al. The Influence of Food Texture and Liquid Consistency Modification on Swallowing Physiology and Function: A Systematic Review. Dysphagia 2015;30(1):2-26. DOI:10.1007/s00455-014-9578-x. [ Links ]

22. Zargaraan A, Rastmanesh R, Fadavi G, Zayeri F, Mohammadifar MA. Rheological aspects of dysphagia-oriented food products: A mini review. Food Sci Hum Wellness [Internet] 2013;2(3-4):173-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2013.11.002. DOI:10.1016/j.fshw.2013.11.002. [ Links ]

23. Joint T, Group W. National Descriptors for Texture Modification. Br Diet Assoc R Coll Speech Lanuage Ther 2003. [ Links ]

24. Atherton M, Bellis-Smith N, Cichero J, Suter M. Texture-modified foods and thickened fluids as used for individuals whith dysphagia: Australian standardized labels and definitions. Nutr Diet 2007;64(2):53-76. [ Links ]

25. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare. Food for special dietary uses. Japonese Govrnment. 2009. [ Links ]

26. Institute I&IN and D. Irish consistency descriptors for modified fluids and food. 2009. [ Links ]

27. Mccullough G, Pelletier C, Steele C. The Asha Leader 2003;8:16-27. Available from: https://www.asha.org/SLP/clinical/dysphagia/Dysphagia-Diets/. DOI:10.1044/leader.FTR3.08202003.16. [ Links ]

28. Martineau C. International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative: IDDSI Framework. Med des Mal Metab 2015;13(1):101-2. [ Links ]

29. De Sordi M, Mourão L, Silva L. Comportamento reológico e nomenclatura dos alimentos utilizados por fonoaudiólogos de serviços de disfagia. Rev CEFAC 2012;14(5):925-32. DOI:10.1590/S1516-18462011005000145. [ Links ]

30. Cichero J. IDDSI Framework - Testing Methods 2017;1-12. Available from: www.iddsi.org [ Links ]

31. Fonseca T, Loiola R, Coelho E. Atuação fonoaudiológica no atendimento domiciliar. Rev Tecer 2015;14(8):38-51. DOI:10.15601/1983-7631/rt.v8n14p38-51. [ Links ]

32. Silva S, Musse R, Nemr K. Assistência domiciliar na cidade de Salvador-BA: possibilidade de atuação fonoaudiológica em motricidade orofacial. Rev CEFAC 2009;11(1):94-101. DOI:10.1590/S1516-18462009005000001. [ Links ]

33. Goes V, Carpes P, Oliveira L, Hack J, Magro M, Bonini J. Avaliação do risco de disfagia, estado nutricional e ingestão calórica em idosos com Alzheimer. Rev Latino-Am Enferm 2014;22(2):317-24. DOI:10.1590/0104-1169.3252.2418. [ Links ]

34. Maneira A, De Lima Zanata I. A frequência de disfagia em idosos em um hospital da cidade de Curitiba-PR. Rev Saúde Pública do Paraná[Internet] 2018;1(1):20-6. Available from: http://revista.escoladesaude.pr.gov.br/index.php/rspp/article/view/36. DOI:10.32811/2595-4482.2018v1n1.36. [ Links ]

Machado AS, Moreira CHS, Vimercati DCS, Pereira TC, Endringer DC. Consistencies and terminologies – the use of International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative. Nutr Hosp 2019;36(6):1273-1277.

Received: May 24, 2019; Accepted: October 13, 2019

Correspondence: Denise Coutinho Endringer. Universidade Vila Velha. Espírito Santo, Brazil e-mail:denise.endringer@uvv.br

Author´s contribution:

All authors have read, approved and made substantial contributions for the manuscript

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons