SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.33 issue6Health in all policies in the Valencian Community: steps towards the health impact assessmentTwo easy ways to interpret the famous factor loads author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  


Services on Demand




Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Gaceta Sanitaria

Print version ISSN 0213-9111

Gac Sanit vol.33 n.6 Barcelona Nov./Dec. 2019  Epub Jan 27, 2020 

Letter to the Editor

Scientific misconduct and Iranian scientists

Mala conducta científica y científicos iraníes

Sara Dakhesh1  , Ali Hamidi* 

1Medical Library & Information Sciences, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran

To the Editor:

The quantity of researches and their equivalent outputs as articles has been increased in recent years. But the main concern in this regard is scientific misconduct. Especially in recent years, we witnessed an increasing number of retracted articles in various subjects.1 Understanding the importance of this issue, we read and used the article entitled Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors with great interest. The authors investigate the retracted articles that were indexed in PubMed from 2013 to 2016 and tried to highlight the main causes of their retraction. After defining scientific misconduct in detail, they discussed the ways by which the scientific community can decrease these misconducts.2

One of the findings of the article is that “the highest proportion of retracted publications corresponded to Iran (15.52 per 10,000)”. Considering this, it's concluded that “a possible explanation might also be less stringent control policies on the researchers’ publication track or a higher awareness of Editors due to other experiences with research coming from these countries in the past”.2 Regarding this, it's necessary to mention the following issues:

  • According to the report of Springer Nature (the Nature's publisher) on November 1, 2016, “58 articles authored by 282 Iran-based researchers were retracted today… 25 in Tumour Biology… 23 papers in Diagnostic Pathology”.3 This shows that a considering part of Iran affiliated retracted papers (about 65%), has been retracted at the end of 2016, the last year of the investigated period in this article. (Deducting these articles, Iran's retracted papers will be 5.05 per 10,000.) It's obvious that these authors and the two mentioned journals cannot be a true representative for Iranian researchers. It should be taken into account that the authors of the article didn’t mention any reason for selection of this 4 year period (2013-2016) and any change in this period can change the results.

  • Considering the events of scientific misconduct, serious legal action took place with all 282 authors who had fraud in the mentioned event including degradation in academic rankings and even expulsion from research centers. In addition to that, “the law on the prevention and confronting against fraud in scientific outcomes” announced to the universities by the president office of Iran in 2017.4 Also, due to the fact that about half of these articles were in medical fields, the National Research Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran developed and announced mechanisms such as the guidelines to inform researches about scientific misconduct. In addition, this committee starts to empower the research ethics committees at universities in order to manage misconducts.5 Regarding these activities, we hope in near future the scientific misconduct by Iranian researchers decreases significantly.


1. Budd JM, Coble Z, Abritis A. An investigation of retracted articles in the biomedical literature. Proc Assoc Info Sci Tech. 2016;53:1-9. [ Links ]

2. Campos-Varela I, Ruano-Ravina A. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors. Gac Sanit. 2018; piiS0213-9111:30072-4, [ Links ]

3. Callaway E. Publisher pulls 58 articles by Iranian scientists over authorship manipulation. Nature. 2016 (Accessed 01/15/2019.) Available at: [ Links ]

4. Laws and Regulations Portal of Iran (Internet). The Law on Prevention and Control of Fraud in the Preparation of Scientific Works. (Accessed 01/24/2019.) Available at: [ Links ]

5. Iranian Students' News Agency (Internet). A review of ethics in biomedical research. (Accessed 01/25/2019.) Available at: 97092914882/. [ Links ]


E-mail (A. Hamidi).

Authorship contributions

Both authors have contributed to preparation and the final design of this manuscript.

Conflicts of interest


Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons