SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.102 número7Erosiones duodenales: un hallazgo endoscópico infrecuente en la enfermedad celiacaMetástasis agudas fulminantes de cáncer de colon tras el trasplante renal índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas

versión impresa ISSN 1130-0108

Rev. esp. enferm. dig. vol.102 no.7 Madrid jul. 2010

 

PICTURES IN DIGESTIVE PATHOLOGY

 

Intragastric foreign body: a rare cause of abdominal pain

Cuerpo extraño intragástrico: una causa poco frecuente de dolor abdominal

 

 

J. Egea Valenzuela1, F. Alberca de las Parras1, F. J. Ruiz López2, A. Martínez Caselles1, J. Molina Martínez1 and F. Carballo Álvarez1

1Services of Digestive Diseases (Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit) and 2Neumology. University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca. Murcia, Spain

 

 

Case report

A 54 year-old woman was admitted to the Neumology Service in our Hospital due to hemoptysis. Fifteen years ago she was diagnosed peptic ulcer, and received medical treatment with good evolution. During the present episode she suddenly suffered acute epigastric pain, not irradiated, not accompanied by nausea or vomiting and her injury worsened after food ingestion. Complete laboratory tests were carried out, with no abnormalities. Simple abdominal X-ray was anodyne, and ultrasound was informed as normal.

We were commented this case and, considering the patient's precedents, the decision was to run an upper endoscopy, which took place about 36 hours after the beginning of her symptoms. We could observe the presence of a thin long foreign body, penetrating gastric mucosa at both ends, located on prepyloric area (Fig. 1). It seemed to be a bone and mucosa presented incipient inflammatory reaction at impactation points. The foreign body was removed and we could see two small not complicated ulcerations (Fig. 2). The bone was a little chicken rib, about three centimeters long and had very sharpened ends.

 

After these findings, a second look was made on the abdominal X-ray. A more exhaustive study showed the presence of a small, long calcic image, about three centimeters long, located on upper right abdomen, which had not been detected in the first exams and seemed to be the chicken bone (Fig. 3). In the following hours the patient presented a good evolution, with no pain and normal oral feeding.

 

Discussion

Ingestion of foreign bodies is relatively frequent, especially in pediatric population and psychiatric patients. In healthy adults accidental ingestion is not rare, but foreign bodies usually pass spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract and only a few need endoscopic procedures. About 10% of these patients suffer penetration of the foreign body and present some symptoms, so that an endoscopy is run for diagnosis or treatment. Only 1% suffers perforation of gastrointestinal wall, especially at esophagus or cecum, and present related complications such as wall abscesses, hemorrhage, peritonitis or intraabdominal abscesses, just to mention some of those described in literature. Radiology can be useful for diagnosis, especially in cases of great clinical suspicion or big sized foreign bodies or with metallic or calcic densities. Endoscopic renoval is safe when we face non complicated penetrations and endoclips may be used to close mucosal defects, definitively or as a previous procedure before surgery.

Impactation of an intragastric foreign body is an exceptional cause of abdominal pain, with not much reported cases. Moreover, most of these diagnoses were obtained after several radiological studies or after a laparotomy. This etiology should be considered in diagnosis of abdominal pain, especially in patients with atypical symptoms, acute sharp beginning of the symptoms or normality of the most frequent complementary studies.

 

Recommended references

1. Vivas Balcones D, Martínez Prada C, Torres-Gárate R, Sanz M, Antolín Arias J, Cigüenza Gabriel R. Dolor abdominal de etiología muy infrecuente. Rev Clin Esp 2006; 206(11): 583-4.        [ Links ]

2. Jin-Soo K, Hyung-Keun K, Young-Seok C, Hiun-Suk C, Chang-Whan K, Byung-Wook K, et al. Extraction and clipping repair of a chicken bone penetrating the gastric wall. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(12): 1955-7.        [ Links ]

3. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Johanson JF, et al. Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 802-6.        [ Links ]

4. Mehran A, Podkameni D, Rosenthal A, Szomstein S. Gastric perforation secondary to ingestion of sharp foreign body. JSLS (2005)9: 91-3.        [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons