INTRODUCTION
Oral dermoid cysts and ranulae are uncommon, frequently misdiagnosed, and often inadequately treated1,2. A dermoid cyst is defined as a closed, epithelium-lined cavity thats contains dermal adnexal structures. On the other hand, a ranula is described as a mucocele that occurs in the floor of the mouth, arising from the sublingual gland. When this swelling in the floor of the mouth also dissects through the mylohyoid muscle and produces swelling within the neck it is referred to as plunging ranula3.
Oral dermoid cysts and ranulae both present as painless, soft and compressible lesions, and due to their due to the common anatomical location, may be indistinguishable during clinical examination. However, it is essential to note that the therapeutic options differ considerably for each lesion. Differential diagnosis is the first step towards proper treatment, which is crucial to prevent recurrence and sequelae.
This article presents a large, lateral, dermoid cyst in the floor of mouth, initially misdiagnosed by imaging studies as a ranula. Clinical, radiological and therapeutic aspects of oral dermoid cysts and ranulae will also be discussed to aid in the correct diagnosis and management of these lesions.
CASE REPORT
A 15-year-old male presented with a 6-month history of a slowly growing swelling in the right side of the floor of the mouth. He had no other signs or symptoms and no relevant medical history. Examination showed a soft, non-tender, and non-fluctuant mass with normal overlying mucosa (Figure 1A). Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated similar results of a well-defined thin walled cystic formation with 7 cm in maximal diameter in the right sublingual space (Figure 1 D-F). Both reports concluded that the findings were consistent with a ranula, and consequently marsupialization was planned. An intraoral incision was used but as an encapsulated lesion with a yellowish thick creamy material was detected submucosally, planned procedure was modified to complete enucleation of the lesion (Figure 1B). Histopathology report stated characteristics compatible with a dermoid cyst. Recovery was uneventful and at reevaluation, 12 months postoperatively, there was no recurrence (Figure 1C).
DISCUSSION
Several pathologic conditions can cause masses in the floor of the mouth. Cases of dermoid cysts preoperatively diagnosed ranulae are present in literature1,2,4 5-6. This may be due to their similar clinical presentation, as both are painless, soft and compressible lesions, which can cause tongue fullness, with subsequent difficulty with swallowing, speech and breathing1,7. However, ranulae usually present with a blue, dome-shaped swelling, located lateral to the midline. This helps distinguish them from midline dermoid cysts. In the case presented, the dermoid cyst was present at the right side in the floor of the mouth. This might have been a contributing factor to the initial misdiagnosis, as lateral dermoid cysts are rare8.
Imaging studies are important to assist in the differential diagnosis, but may be difficult with dermoid cysts and ranulae, as both appear as thin-walled, cystic lesions, which are hypodense on CT and can present with high-intensity on T2- weighted images on MRI9. Nevertheless, each have certain distinguishing characteristics, such the "sack of marbles" appearance that is pathognomonic for dermoid cysts, caused by areas of fat attenuation on CT10. Additionally, plunging ranulae may demonstrate a thin "tail" of fluid from the collapsed sublingual space that appears to dive into the submandibular space on imaging; this sign can occasionally be seen on CT and MR imaging, and can be an important diagnostic clue when visualized9,10. In the present case, the appearance on CT and MRI imaging reports misdiagnosed the lesion as a ranula.
It is important to make the correct clinical diagnosis, as therapeutic options differ considerably between ranulae and dermoid cysts. Treatment for ranulae consists of removal of the feeding sublingual gland and/or marsupialization11. In contrast, the only effective treatment for dermoid cysts is surgical removal with complete enucleation3. A diversity of opinions remain on the whether enucleation of dermoid cysts via extraoral or intraoral approach should be preferred, with anatomical location and size as the most significant considerations12. It has been suggested that dermoid cysts larger than 6 cm in diameter and located sublingually should be excised with extraoral approach, whereas in lesions less than 6 cm in diameter, found above the mylohoid muscle, an intraoral approach is more suitable and should be preferred because of its cosmetic results12. In the case presented, a successful intraoral surgical excision of a dermoid cyst measuring 7 cm maximal diameter is shown.
Differential diagnosis of masses in the floor of the mouth such as vascular anomalies, thyroglossal duct cyst, infectious processes, lymphatic malformation, and tumors should also be considered2,7. Due to the history, clinical presentation and radiologic aspects of our case, other diagnosis were ruled out and marsupialization of a ranula was planned as treatment. Intraoperative features of a true cystic lesion with an interior of a yellowish thick creamy material ultimately led to the correct diagnosis of dermoid cyst, later confirmed with histological examination.
CONCLUSION
Dermoid cysts and ranulae are commonly misdiagnosed due to their scarcity and relatively similar clinical presentations. An overview of the characteristics of both dermoid cysts and ranulae is presented below (Table 1). This article aims to show practical differences to assist in their correct diagnosis and management. In conclusion and most importantly, intraoperative features should be taken in account for adequate management, as in the present case.