SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 número2Terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad en esclerosis múltiple: revisión sistemática de costo-efectividad índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Farmacia Hospitalaria

versión On-line ISSN 2171-8695versión impresa ISSN 1130-6343

Farm Hosp. vol.44 no.2 Toledo mar./abr. 2020  Epub 28-Sep-2020

https://dx.doi.org/10.7399/fh.11340 

Clinical case

Guillain-Barre syndrome of a patient under bortezomib treatment

María Mar Herráez-Aibendea1  , Almudena Amorós-Paredes2  , Marta Arteta-Jiménez2 

1Hematology and Hemotherapy Service, Hospital Santa Barbara, Puertollano, Ciudad Real. Spain.

2Pharmacy Service, Hospital Santa Barbara, Puertollano, Ciudad Real. Spain.

KEYWORDS: Multiple myeloma; Guillain-Barre syndrome; Bortezomib; Neuropathy; Adverse reactions

Introduction

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is an autoimmune polyradiculoneuro pathy that affects the peripheral nerves and nerve roots, presenting itself as a flaccid, ascending reflux paralysis, which can cause respiratory failure and death. This can be reversed if the cause is known and an early diagno sis is made. There are recognized triggers such as infections, vaccines, neo plastic processes, pregnancy and surgery. However, the ratio with drugs such as bortezomib has occasionally been included in the literature as an event prior to the occurrence of said entity1,2.

Bortezomib is a reversible proteasome inhibitor drug indicated for either monotherapy or combined therapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) adult patients, as well as refractory or relapsing patients and in mantle cell lymphoma. Proteasome inhibition alters the regu latory proteins that control the progression of the cell cycle causing its arrest and apoptosis3. The most reported side effect by using this drug affects the gastrointestinal system, others are weakness, peripheral neuropathy and decreased platelet count-frequent manifestations that can occur in mo notherapy or in combination-. This paper describes the case of a patient diagnosed with MM IgA Kappa International Staging System (ISS)-Stage II, Durie-Salmon Stage (DS) II-A with secondary amyloidosis and cardiac and renal involvement under bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone4 (VRD) therapy, developing GBS in the course of treatment.

Case description

Seventy-seven-year-old woman with a personal history of arterial hyper tension on olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg/amlodipine 5 mg every 24 hours, diagnosed with MM IgA-Kappa with secondary amyloidosis and cardiac and renal involvement on VRD treatment, adjusted at the beginning of each cycle according to creatinine clearance and hematological values (bortezo mib 1.3 mg/m2/subcutaneous on days +1, +4, +8 and +11 of each cycle, lenalidomide 10 mg orally/day from day +1 to day +21 of each cycle and dexamethasone 20 mg/oral from day +1 to day +4 and from day +9 to day +12 of each cycle). On the +8 day of the second cycle, the patient reported an accidental fall as well as clamping and weakness of both lower limbs, of proximal predominance, not associated with loss of consciousness, sphincter relaxation or other symptoms. The neurological examination re vealed aquilea and patellar reflexes, not developing autonomic alterations or loss of sensation. The analytical study showed leukocytes 3,600 mm3, neutrophils 1,400/mm3, platelets 93,000 mm3, creatinine 1.6 mg/dL (glo merular filtration estimate of 33.06 mL/min), p2-microglobulin 5 mg/L, while the remaining parameters were normal. A lumbar puncture was performed observing albumino/cytological dissociation (proteins 2.58 g/L, leukocytes 0, glucose 53 mg/dL). This resulted in Gram staining and negative cultures, ruling out the presence of malignant cells in the histopathologic study. Elec trophysiological studies showed decreased motor conduction velocities in the peripheral nerves of lower limbs, with normal amplitude and prolonga tion of distal latencies. The electromyogram described neurogenic traces of diminished amplitude with intense partial loss of motor unit potentials of the big toe's and abductor muscles-with no spontaneous denervation activity-, as well as neurogenic traces of diminished amplitude and intense motor unit potentials partial loss in the quadriceps muscle, with no spontaneous de nervation activity. A nuclear magnetic resonance was performed observing signs of chronic ischemic microangiopathy.

The patient was diagnosed with GBS, bortezomib treatments was im mediately stopped due to neurotoxic complications clearly established with this drug. Thus, the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin 0.4 g/kg/day for five days was initiated, resulting in a complete clinical recovery and maintaining the remaining therapeutic scheme -since a pro gressive improvement of the neurological symptomatology was observed after the suspension of bortezomib-.

Discussion

Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor widely used in the MM treatment, as well as in mantle cell lymphoma. The neurotoxic effects induced by bor tezomib and lenalidomide are very variable. In some cases, they are confu sed with neurological diseases or with progression of their hematological di sease. Symptoms may appear after the first doses or months after treatment. However, even though the majority of patients who develop them do not present an immediate risk, they should be carefully evaluated. Serious cases of bortezomib-induced neurotoxicity have been reported, such as cerebral edema, transient ischemic accident, coma, imbalance of the autonomic ner vous system, autonomic neuropathy, and even psychomotor hyperactivity, among others, the latter being considered as rare adverse effects.

GBS is an acute autoimmune polyradiculoneuropathy that affects the spinal cord's peripheral nerves and nerve roots. The patient developed the symptomatology on day +8 of the second cycle of the VRD scheme, with no other precipitating factors such as infections, vaccines, neoplastic processes, pregnancy or surgery. The symptoms that allowed us to suspect the diagnosis of GBS were distal weakness and developed dysflexia, along with neurophysiological signs and cerebrospinal fluid alteration5,6. Clinical improvement after discontinuation of the drug and receiving treatment with immunoglobulins suggests an effect associated with this complication. The temporal ratio between the use of bortezomib and the developed sympto matology in the described case maintaining lenalidomide seems to be a very suggestive causal link between both7,8.

The case presented and the scarce published literature indicate that, although this adverse effect is not included in the summary product cha racteristics, GBS is a possible potentially serious side effect with a high morbidity and mortality rate, since it may occur during the course of borte zomib treatment. Therefore, attention should be paid to this complication, as reported in the literature, such as the case published in 2015 by Dai et al. and in 2019 by Xu et al. It is considered important to take into account the differential diagnosis of neuropathies, so that an appropriate diagnosis and treatment can be established as early as possible. In this case, MM could be a risk factor for the development of GBS induced by bortezomib. In conclusion, although it is a rare adverse effect, the association of GBS induced by bortezomib should be considered, even after the first treatment cycle. This case has been notified to the Pharmacovigilance Center of Castilla-La Mancha.

Bibliography

1. Xu YL, Zhao WH, Tang ZY, Li ZQ, Long Y, Cheng P, et al. Guillain-Barre syndrome in a patient with multiple myeloma after bortezomib therapy: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7(18):2905-9. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2905 [ Links ]

2. Dai X, Sun X, Ni H, Zhu X. Guillain Barre syndrome in a multiple myeloma patient after the first course of bortezomib therapy: A case report. Onco Lett. 2015;10(5):3064-6. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3634 [ Links ]

3. European Medicines Agency. Ficha técnica de bortezomib (Velcade®) (internet) (accessed 11/25/2019). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/velcade-epar-product-information_es.pdfLinks ]

4. Moreau P, San Miguel J, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, Zamagni E, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Multiple Myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(Suppl_4):iv52-61. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx096 [ Links ]

5. Fujimura H. The Guillain-Barre syndrome. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;115:383-402. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52902- 2.00021-7 [ Links ]

6. Yuki N, Hartung HP. Guillain-Barre syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(24):2294-304. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1114525 [ Links ]

7. Richardson PG, Briemberg H, Jagannath S, Wen PY, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. Frequency, characteristics, and reversibility of peripheral neuropathy during treatment of advanced multiple myeloma with bortezomib. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3113-20. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7779 [ Links ]

8. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30(2):239-45. DOI: 1038/clpt.1981.154 [ Links ]

Funding: No funding.

How to cite this paper: Herráez-Albendea MM, Amorós-Paredes A, Arteta-Jiménez M. Guillain-Barré syndrome of a patient under bortezomib treatment. Farm Hosp. 2020;44(2):77-8.

Received: October 05, 2019; Accepted: January 03, 2020

Author of correspondence María Mar Herráez Albendea C/ Julio Palacios, 29, escalera B, planta 13, puerta D 28029, Madrid, Spain. Email: marherraez@gmail.com

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interests.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License