Mi SciELO
Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
Enfermería Global
versión On-line ISSN 1695-6141
Enferm. glob. vol.18 no.55 Murcia jul. 2019 Epub 21-Oct-2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.18.3.334781
Originals
Confirmatory factor analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire/operating room
1Nurse. PhD in Sciences. Post-doctorate from the Department of Professional Orientation of the University of São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. danielalourencao@usp.br
2Nurse. PhD in Nursing. Associate professor, Department of Professional Orientation, University of São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Objective
To analyze the factor structure of the version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room Version that has been translated and culturally adapted to the Brazilian context.
Method
This was a methodological study about a questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered to 412 health professionals who worked in operating rooms. The factor structure was tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach's alpha. Results: The total score for Cronbach's alpha was 0.912; and the scores for the domains ranged from 0.56 and 0.85. The domain with the worst performance was communication in the surgical setting.
Theresultsof CFA showed that the score for SRMR was 0.052, RMSEA, 0.031, and CFI, 0.95. These scores indicate the reliability and acceptability of the Brazilian adaptation of the questionnaire.
Conclusion
The factor structure demonstrated the validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the questionnaire for measuring the patient safety climate as perceived by healthcare professionals who worked in surgical settings
Key words: Patient Safety; Surgicenters; Perioperative Nursing; Validation Studies
INTRODUCTION
Errors and adverse events in health care have been intensely discussed worldwide because of their impact on people's lives, whether patients, professionals or managers, as well as on healthcare systems.
The estimated care and economic impacts of adverse events in Brazil were published in a 2018 report on hospital care safety. The results showed that in 2016, in both the private and public hospital systems, 1,377,243 Brazilians were victims of an acquired condition (adverse event). The authors inferred that conditions acquired in hospitals caused 120,514 to 302,610 deaths, and established that 302,610 was representative of the Brazilian reality. The study confirmed that, along with increased hospital morbimortality, adverse events incur significant social costs, since the burden of hospital care errors in the private system reached R$ 15.57 billion1.
One of the many challenges inherent to the health sector is the surgical environment, where complex interdisciplinary activities are performed that are strongly dependent on individual actions, with a high risk of adverse events (AEs)2,3.
Surgery is considered one of the most complex and expensive services provided by healthcare systems. A study in the United States conducted in 2012 showed approximately 312.9 million surgery-related deaths around the world4. Additionally, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), half of the adverse events that occured with hospitalized patients were relative to surgical care, of which at least half could have been prevented, pointing to the impact of unsafe surgical care in healthcare systems5.
Another literature review identified that approximately 48% of all adverse events were related to surgical and anesthetic procedures, and that 30% to 50% of these were prevenTable6.
It is especially important to analyze surgical AEs because of their frequency. Brazilian cost estimates associated with patients who are victims of surgical AEs indicate an increase in the costs of hospital care, because in approximately 45% of AEs, the mean hospital stay was extended 14 days7.
Thus, measuring and analyzing safety culture in health organizations based on the perceptions of the safety climate by healthcare professionals allows the identification and management of aspects directed toward patient safety. This type of assessment can provide the basis for situational diagnoses, continuing education programs, care protocols, and monitoring AEs and quality of care.
The literature demonstrates that safety culture has been evaluated using psychometric questionnaires, with specific versions for different hospital settings8.
Therefore, research instruments need to be translated and adapted to various cultures and countries to maintain their content, psychometric characteristics, and validity when administered to different populations9.
Validity and reliability are among these psychometric properties. The assessment of internal consistency, which in the literature is called reliability, measures the consistency with which a given set of measurement items estimates a construct or latent dimension10. Thus, it is considered a measurement of the level of consistency between the measurements of a variable11.
One such instrument that measures safety climate is the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ)12, which has been translated and validated in various countries, including Germany, Norway, Turkey, China, Sweden, Denmark and Greece13,14,15,16,17,18,19. However, considering the specificities of healthcare services, the SAQ was constructed for clinical medicine, intensive care, surgery wards, and outpatient settings12.
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room (SAQ/OR) is a version of the SAQ adapted to the surgery ward that was developed by researchers at the University of Texas. It presents the same properties as the generic SAQ version in terms of the construct of patient safety, adapted to the surgical setting and the answer scale20.The SAQ/OR has been translated and adapted in Sweden, Japan and Portugal, maintaining its psychometric properties,21,22,23 and both the original and culturally adapted versions of the SAQ and the SAQ/OR present good psychometric properties.
The SAQ/OR was culturally adapted and validated in Brazil in a study with 590 subjects who worked in four hospitals in the municipality of São Paulo24. The result was an instrument in Portuguese calledQuestionário de Atitudes de Segurança/Centro Cirúrgico(SAQ/CC), with 40 items and 6 domains. The following domains emerged: safety climate; perception of management; perception of stress; working conditions; communication in the operating room; and perception of professional performance25. The questionnaire has been shown to be reliable, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.87, ranging between 0.59 and 0.82 among domains. The reliability of the SAQ/CC is similar to that of other cultural adaptation studies of the SAQ/OR21,22,23.
The Brazilian cultural adaptation and validation of the SAQ/CC used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) because the SAQ/OR dimensions (latent factors or dimensions) were not present. Two of the domains found in the present study did not emerge in the generic version of the SAQ: communication in the surgical setting and perception of professional performance.25.
Thus, in the present study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to deepen the understanding of the psychometric properties of the SAQ/CC.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the factor structure of the translated and culturally adapted version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room Version to the Brazilian context.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
The aim of this methodological study was to analyze the Brazilian SAQ/CC using confirmatory factor analysis.
Psychometric studies require that the statistical resources used to validate instruments include different factor analysis techniques. Their main function is to reduce a large number of observed variables to a lower number of factors that represent latent constructs or dimensions11,26.
Factor analysis analytical techniques are exploratory or confirmatory. In exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the components to be extracted or the variables that make up the constructs or latent dimensions are not known a priori11.
Confirmatory factor analysis is used to test the goodness of fit of the factors/constructs defined by EFA11.
Confirmatory factor analysis is defined as a confirmatory procedure, and is a method used primarily to assess the construct validity of measurements rather than for data reduction27 Additionally, it is used to confirm established factor structures and to test whether the theoretical factor analysis fits the observed data.
The study population consisted of healthcare professionals who worked in operating rooms, according to the following inclusion criteria:
- Nurses, nursing technicians and aides who had at least six months of experience in the unit who were working at the time of data collection.
- Surgeons, residents, anestheseologists and surgical technologists who participated in at least three procedures/month.
Sample calculation resulted in 400 participants, with 10 subjects for each item in the SAQ/CC. Based on this, a convenience sample of 412 participants was selected.
The study was conducted in three public hospitals and one private hospital in the states of São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Bahia. To preserve anonymity, the participating institutions were called A, B, C and D.
Institution A was a public teaching hospital located in the municipality of São Paulo, classified as an extra-capacity hospital. The surgery ward consisted of 40 operating rooms, with an average of 2,000 procedures conducted per month.
Institution B was a private, tertiary and philanthropic hospital located in the municipality of São Paulo. The surgery ward had 25 operating rooms and carried out an average of 2,750 procedures per month.
Institution C was part of the Unified Health System (SUS) as a reference in high-complexity tertiary care in the metropolitan region of the state of Rio de Janeiro. It was a medium-capacity federal public hospital. The surgery ward consisted of five operating rooms, which performed approximately 90 surgeries per month.
Institution D was a general public teaching hospital, a reference in medium-to-high complexity care for the state of Bahia. The institution was considered large-capacity. Its surgical ward had five operating rooms and performed 300 surgeries per month.
The Instrument: Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room (SAQ/CC)
The SAQ/CC version of the questionnaire is divided into three parts. The first refers to the quality of communication and collaboration among professionals who work in the surgical setting, where subjects must respond in terms of their relationship with each professional category. The second consists of 40 statements that encompass patient safety and one item asking whether the respondent had ever answered the questionnaire before. The third part gathers demographic information (gender, race/ethnicity, professional category, and time in profession, among others). The instrument also has a blank space where respondents are asked to write three recommendations to improve patient safety in the operating room.
In all, the instrument consists of 40 items answered on a 5-point Likert scale, one question with a simple yes/no answer option about whether the respondent had ever taken the questionnaire before, and a blank space for recommendations.
The authors of the original questionnaire scored it as follows: "completely disagree” equals 0 points, “partially disagree,” 25 points, “neither agree nor disagree,” 50 points, “partially disagree,” 75 points, and “completely agree,” 100 points. The alternative “Does not apply” was not considered when calculating the score. Score calculation followed these steps: first, negative items are reversed; next, they are grouped in domains, and the score for each domain is obtained by calculating the mean total score, i.e., the sum of the scores for the items in each domain divided by the number of items in the domain The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 for the worst perception of safety climate and 100 for the best. Scores higher than or equal to 75 represent a positive perception of patient safety12.
The SAQ/CC domains and their respective items/statements were extracted from the PhD thesis that adapted and validated the instrument to the Brazilian context25.
Data collection took place between September 2016 and March 2017.
Meetings were held with the directors, managers and members of the surgery ward teams to explain the objective and methods of the study. The data were gathered by the researcher and a person trained by her.
The professionals were approached in the surgery ward; before answering the questionnaire, they signed informed consent forms. At this time, the researchers explained the objectives of the study and provided instructions about how to answer the instrument and the estimated time for completion (15 minutes)12.
Based on the list of surgical staff and the surgery schedule, data collection took place between Monday and Friday. Considering the dynamics of the operating room and the need to represent all professional categories, the questionnaires were distributed in person - in some units, to the nursing managers or the coordinators of medical teams - and collected at a later time.
The data were organized on an electronic spreadsheet and analyzed using statistical computer programs.
The data were submitted to CFA to validate the questionnaire's constructs, and reliability was measured with Cronbach's alpha.
The results are presented below in charts, Tables and figures, and descriptive variables, according to absolute and relative frequencies and measures of central tendency.
The cultural adaptation and validation of the SAQ/OR was authorized by the original authors via electronic contact.
The project was approved by the research ethics committees of the School of Nursing of the University of São Paulo and the co-participating institutions under protocol no. 1.596.349 of June 16, 2016 and Certificate of Presentation for Ethical Appraisal: 52951116.8.0000.5392.
All subjects volunteered to participate and their anonymity was ensured when presenting the results. The researchers explained the objectives and study method and the participants were given an invitation letter and two copies of an informed consent form to sign, drafted according to Resolution 466/12 of the Brazilian National Health Council.
RESULTS
Descriptive analysis of the questionnaire
To validate the psychometric properties of the SAQ/CC, it was administered to a sample of 412 subjects, of whom 150 were at institution A, 145 at institution B, 64 at institution C, and 53 at institution D.
Descriptive analysis was conducted for the answers and the sociodemographic data using frequency distribution and summary measures: mean, median, standard deviation, and maximum and minimum values. Table 1 shows that in terms of professional category, most participants were surgery technologists or circulating nurses, with 112 (27.5%), followed by 89 (21.8%) surgeons/assistant surgeons and 76 (18.6%) anesthesiologists/assistant anesthesiologists. The medical team represented 59.3% of the sample (surgeons, anesthesiologists, surgical and anesthesiology residents) and the nursing team (nurses, nursing technicians, surgical tecnologists and circulating nurses) represented 39.7%.
Regarding gender, most were male (52.9%) and white (66.8%). Regarding work arrangements and schedules, most worked full time, with 176 (44.4%), and full shifts, with 153 (45%).
The age of the health professionals varied from 24 to 81 years, with a mean age of 37.61 years (±10.61) and a median of 35. In terms of time of work experience in their specialty, it varied between 1 and 54 years, with a mean of 11.14 years (±9.98), and time working at the institution ranged from 6 months to 57 years, with a mean of 9.03 years (±9.19).
During the data collection process, questions arose about the professional positions and categories. This was relative to the surgical technologists and circulating nurses being categorized under one alternative in the part of the questionnaire that describes communication and collaboration among health professionals and in the part about personal information.
Thus, on analyzing the professional categories that make up the instrument, the researchers found it necessary to modify the types of nursing categories, as shown inAppendix 1.
It is important to emphasize that the changes made refer to the nursing team; however, to maintain the instrument's layout, the category “bedside nurse” was removed, because there were four categories of nurses, and bedside nurses were referred to as OR nurses.
Validation of the questionnaire
The questionnaire's reliability was assessed based on its internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and the results showed that the instrument is reliable, with a total alpha of 0.91. In terms of domains, the scores ranged between 0.85 and 0.56, as illustrated in Table 2.
The results of CFA are presented in Table 3. The index scores show a satisfactory goodness-of-fit of the final SAQ/CC model. The SRMR was 0.052, RMSEA was 0.031, and CFI was 0.95. According to the literature,11 these values demonstrate accepTable goodness-of-fit of the Brazilian version of the SAQ/OR.
DISCUSSION
The analysis of the sociodemographic data shows that the sample was represented mostly by white male health professionals. The data corroborate those found in the study conducted to translate, adapt and validate the SAQ/OR to the Brazilian context25. No significant differences were found in terms of sex and ethnicity. These data are in accordance with those in a study carried out by the Federal Council of Medicine, which showed a predominance of men in their forties28.
In the present study, the medical category represented 59.3% of the sample, and the nursing staff, 39.7%, while in the SAQ/OR validation study, the medical category represented 68.5% of the sample and nursing, 31.3%25, pointing to a more evenly distributed sample. However, it is worth emphasizing that in the surgical setting, the nursing team was in constant activity before, during and after surgical procedures and therefore had less time to answer the questionnaire.
The literature on the realiability of research instruments indicates that a questionnaire is consistent when the total Cronbach's alpha varies between 0.70 and 0.9529.
The results of this investigation are similar to those of other SAQ/OR validation studies. In the Japanese adaptation, the total Cronbach's alpha was 0.74, in Portugal, 0.90, and in the study developed in Switzerland, the alphas for the domains ranged from 0.59 to 0.8321,22,23.
On comparing the score obtained in this study (0.91) with the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the SAQ/OR to the Brazilian context, whose total alpha was 0.87 and the domains ranged between 0.82 and 0.59,25the results are analogous. However, total and domain scores were higher, except for the domain “communication in the operating room.”
Among the domains of the Brazilian SAQ/CC version, it is worth emphasizing that two domains are specific to the version for the surgical ward: communication in the operating room and perception of professional performance25.
In this direction, communication in the operating room includes four items, and its items refer to the information shared among health professionals that interferes with patient safety, obtaining the lowest alpha score. Considering that the authors of the original instrument proposed measuring communication and collaboration among professional categories that work in the surgical center in the first part of the questionnaire, and that communication is a crucial aspect in the work process of surgical teams, this domain provides a tool for evaluating team communication and collaboration and patient safety20.
The Cronbach's alpha for perception of professional performance was 0.77, and its items are related to individual ability to recognize and take responsibility for tiredness as a factor that affects professional practice and patient safety.
In the present study, CFA was employed to validate the results obtained from the exploratory factor analysis of the SAQ/CC. Thus, the data were analyzed using statistical resources to confirm the items that make up the domains of the SAQ/CC, which assesses patient safety in the surgical environment.
Of the indexes used in CFA, the comparative fit index (CFI) is one of the most important for testing the model's goodness of fit for measuring the discrepancy between data and the hypothesis model. Comparative fit index scores range from 0 and 1, with higher vales indicating a better model fit. Thus, a CFI greater than 0.95 is currently accepted as an indicator of goodness of fit11,30.
The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) prevents sample size problems by analyzing the discrepancy between the hypothesis model and the sample's covariance matrix. The RMSEA ranges from 0 to 1, with lower scores indicating better model fit. A score of 0.06 or less indicates an accepTable model fit30.
The standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) is the square root of the discrepancy between the sample's covariance matrix and the model's covariance matrix. It ranges from 0 to 1, with scores equal to 0.8 indicating an accepTable model30.
Last, the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), also known as the non-normalized fit index, demonstrates the quality of fit. The scores are between 0 and 1, and values greater than or equal to 0.90 indicate superior goodness of fit30.
In this regard, considering the indexes presented, the results of the present study are similar to those of other translation, cultural adaptation and validation studies of the SAQ/OR21,22,23, and the factor structure shows that the Brazilian version of the questionnaire is valid and reliable.
CONCLUSION
The present study contributed to deepening knowledge of the validation of instruments that measure safety climate. In light of the results, the questionnaire was consolidated as a reliable instrument for measuring safety climate in the surgical environment in the Brazilian context.
Furthermore, this tool can provide input for managers and researchers when constructing and implementing measures and strategies aimed at ensuring safe surgical care and when conducting surveys to assess safety culture.
REFERENCES
1. Couto RC, Pedrosa TMG, Roberto BAD, Daibert PB. Anuário da segurança assistencial hospitalar no Brasil. UFMG, 2017. [Internet]. [citado 2018 jan. 27]. Disponível em: https://www.caism.unicamp.br/PDF/ASAH.pdf [ Links ]
2. The Health Foundation. Evidence Center. Measuring safety culture. London: The Health Foundation, 2011. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 25]. Available from: http://www.health.org.uk/publications/measuring-safety-culture/ [ Links ]
3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Documento de referência para o Programa Nacional de Segurança do Paciente [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014. [citado 2016 Jan. 27]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/documento_referencia_programa_nacional_seguranca.pdf [ Links ]
4. Weiser TG, Haynes, AB, Molina G, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. The Lancet [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Nov 10];385(S11). Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(15)60806-6.pdf [ Links ]
5. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Segundo desafio global para a segurança do paciente: Cirurgias seguras salvam vidas (orientações para cirurgia segura da OMS). Trad. de Marcela Sánchez Nilo e Irma Angélica Durán. Rio de Janeiro: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; Ministério da Saúde; Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, 2009. 211 p. [ Links ]
6. Fragata JIG. Erros e acidentes no bloco operatório: revisão do estado da arte. Rev Port Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Dez 10];Vol Temat(10):17-26. Available from: https://www.ensp.unl.pt/dispositivos-de-apoio/cdi/cdi/sector-depublicacoes/revista/2010/pdf/volume-tematico-seguranca-do-doente/3Erros%20e%20acidentes%20no%20bloco%20operatorio.pdf [ Links ]
7. Moura MLO, Mendes W. Avaliação de eventos adversos cirúrgicos em hospitais do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Epidemiol [Internet]. 2012 [citado 2015 Dez 10]; 15(3): 523-35. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbepid/v15n3/07.pdf [ Links ]
8. Flin R. Measuring safety culture in healthcare: A case for accurate diagnosis. Saf Sci. 2007; 45: 653-667. [ Links ]
9. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 May 24]; 68(4):435-41. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25698408 [ Links ]
10. Maroco J, Garcia-Marques T. Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questões antigas e soluções modernas? Laboratório de Psicologia. [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2016 Mar 21]; 4(1): 65-90. Available from: http://repositorio.ispa.pt/bitstream/10400.12/133/1/LP%204(1)%20-%2065-90.pdf [ Links ]
11. Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Análise multivariada de dados. Trad. de Adonai Sclup Sant'Anna. 6ªed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2009. [ Links ]
12. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ. The Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) Guidelines for Administration. Technical Report 03-02. The University of Texas Center of Excellence for Patient Safety Research and Practice, [Internet] June 11 2003 [cited 2013 Jan 10]. Available from:http://www.nationalpatientsafetyfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RG_SUPS_Sharing_Mod3_Sexton.pdf [ Links ]
13. Zimmermann N, Küng K, Sereika SM, Engberg S, Sexton B, Schwendimann R. Assessing the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals - a validation study. BMC Health Services Research [Internet] 2013 [cited 2014 Jan 10];13:347. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/347# [ Links ]
14. Deikås E, Hofoss D. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (short form 2006). BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2013 Jan 29];8:191-198. Available from: http://www.orgsun.com/1/18/62634-1-operating-room-version-safety-attitudes-questionnaire-analysis-using.php [ Links ]
15. Kaya S, Barsbay S, Karabulut E. The Turkish Version of the safety attitude questionnaire: psychometric properties and baseline data. Qual Saf Health Care. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2013 Jan 28]; 19:572-577. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20671082 [ Links ]
16. Lee WC, Wung HY, Liao HH, Lo CM, Chang FL, Wang PC, et al. Hospital safety culture in Taiwan: A nationwide survey using chinese version safety attitude questionnaire. BMC Health Serv Res. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2013 Jan 28]; 10: 234-242. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/234 [ Links ]
17. Nordén-Hägg A, Sexton JB, Kälvernark-Sporrong S, Ring L, Kettis-Lindblad A. Assessing safety culture in Pharmacies: The psychometrics validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in a national sample of community pharmacies in Sweden. BMC Clin Pharmacol. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2013 Jan 28];10:8-20. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6904/10/8 [ Links ]
18. Kristensen S, Sabroe S, Bartels P, Mainz J, Christensen KB. Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting. Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Mar 01];7: 149-160. Available from: http://www.dovepress.com/adaption-and-validation-of-the-safety-attitudes-questionnaire-for-the--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CLEP DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S75560 [ Links ]
19. Raftopoulos V, Pavlakis A. Safety climate in 5 intensive care units: A nationwide hospital survey using the Greek-Cypriot version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. J Crit Care. 2013; 28: 51-61. [ Links ]
20. Makary, MA; Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, Millman A, Pryor D, Holzmueller C, Pronovost PJ. Patient Safety in Surgery. Ann Surg. [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2015 Jan 29]; May; 243(5): 628-635. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1570547/ [ Links ]
21. Göras C, Wallentin FY, Nilsson U, Ehrenberg A. Swedish translation and psychometric testing of the safety attitudes questionnaire (operation room version). BMC Health Serv Res. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Jan 28]; 13: 104 - 111. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-13-104.pdf [ Links ]
22. Kawano T, Taniwaki M, Ogata K, Sakamoto M, Yokoyama M. Improvement of teamwork and safety climate following implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist at a university hospital in Japan. J Anesth [Internet]. 2014 [acesso em: 10 Jan 2015]; 28:467-470. Disponível em: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170220 [ Links ]
23. Pinheiro JPA, Uva AS. Safety climate in the operating room: Translation,validation and application of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Rev Port Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Nov 29]; 34(2):107-116. Available from: http://www.elsevier.pt/en/revistas/revista-portuguesa-saude-publica-323/pdf/S0870902515000474/S300/ [ Links ]
24. Lourenção DCA, Tronchin DMR. Segurança do paciente no ambiente cirúrgico: tradução e adaptação cultural de instrumento validado. Acta paul enferm. [Internet]. 2016 Fev [acesso em: 12 Nov 2017] ; 29( 1 ): 1-8. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-21002016000100002&lng=pt http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201600002 [ Links ]
25. Lourenção DCA. Adaptação transcultural e validação do Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room Version para o contexto brasileiro. [Tese]. São Paulo: Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, 2015. [ Links ]
26. Pasquali L. Psicometria: Teoria dos testes na Psicologia e na Educação. Petrópolis. Ed. Vozes, 2ª ed. 2009. [ Links ]
27. Laros JA. O uso da Análise Fatorial: Algumas diretrizes para pesquisadores. In: Pasquali L. Análise fatorial para pesquisadores. Brasília: Publisher; [Internet] 2005. p.141-160. [citado 2015 May 06]. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233735561_O_Uso_da_Analise_Fatorial_Algumas_Diretrizes_para_Pesquisadores [ Links ]
28. Scheffer M, coordenador. Demografia médica no Brasil: dados gerais e descrição de desigualdades [Internet]. São Paulo: CREMESP/CFM; 2011. v. 1. [citado 2016 mar. 08]. Disponível em: http://www.cremesp.org.br/pdfs/demografia_2_dezembro.pdf [ Links ]
29. Terwee Cb, Bot Sdm, Boer Mr, Van Der Windt Dawm, Knol Dl, Dekker J, et al.. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J clin epidemiol [internet]. 2007 [cited 2016 fev 25]; 60:34-42. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17161752 [ Links ]
30. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2017 Nov 25]; 6 (1): 1-55. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10705519909540118 [ Links ]
Received: June 18, 2018; Accepted: August 11, 2018