<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0376-7892</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Cir. plást. iberolatinoam.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0376-7892</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedad Española de Cirugía Plástica, Reparadora y Estética (SECPRE)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0376-78922022000100009</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4321/s0376-78922022000100003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Comparación a largo plazo de resultados en mastopexia con patrón de cicatriz en T invertida o periareolar. Casuística personal]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Long-term comparison of results in mastopexy with inverted T or periareolar scar pattern. Personal casuistry]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Rungs Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zamora Madrazo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Adolfo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González Guevara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Manuel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manzo Hernánez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Martín]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alegre Tamez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eduardo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centro Médico ABC Santa Fe  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Panamericana  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Anáhuac Centro Médico ABC Santa Fe ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>48</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>9</fpage>
<lpage>16</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0376-78922022000100009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0376-78922022000100009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0376-78922022000100009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  Introducción y objetivo. Están descritas múltiples técnicas de mastopexia, sin embargo, los reportes de resultados a largo plazo con diferentes técnicas son escasos. Las que emplean patrón de resección cutánea o patrón de cicatriz en T invertida y periareolar siguen siendo las más utilizadas, motivo por el cual presentamos la comparación de los resultados obtenidos en nuestra experiencia a largo plazo.  Material y método. Estudio longitudinal, comparativo, observacional, retrospectivo, comparando la satisfacción estética y la probabilidad de complicaciones asociadas en 97 casos de mastopexia, operados 48 con técnica en T invertida y 49 con técnica periareolar. Analizamos la homogeneización de los datos con las pruebas x2 y Fisher y empleamos la razón de momios (OR, IC 95%) como medida de asociación entre la técnica quirúrgica utilizada y la probabilidad de presentar complicaciones.  Resultados. A 5 años, de 48 pacientes que declararon satisfacción de 100-80%, todas habían sido operadas con técnica en T invertida (p &lt;0.001). Tanto para la técnica en T invertida como para la técnica periareolar, el valor de p según la prueba de Friedman para muestras relacionadas fue &lt;0.000.  Conclusiones. En nuestra experiencia, el patrón de mastopexia periareolar tiene menor satisfacción y más complicaciones a largo plazo que la técnica en T invertida, de lo que concluimos que el patrón de mastopexia periareolar es recomendable en pacientes con ptosis mamaria grado I y/o con implantes de poco volumen; la mastopexia con técnica en T invertida tiene más satisfacción y menos complicaciones a largo plazo con respecto a ensanchamiento del complejo areola-pezón y asimetría mamaria.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  Background and objective. Multiple mastopexy techniques have been described, however, reports of long-term results in different techniques are scarce. The inverted-T and periaerolar techniques continue to be the most used, reason why we describe our experience with the long-term comparison of the two techniques.  Methods. A longitudinal, comparative, observational, retrospective study comparing aesthetic satisfaction, speed of recovery and the probability of long-term associated complications was carried out in 97 mastopexy cases: 48 operated with the inverted-T technique and 49 with the periareolar technique. The homogenization of the data was analyzed with the x2 and Fisher tests and the odds ratio (OR, 95% CI) was used as a measure of association between the surgical technique used and the probability of presenting complications.  Results. At 5 years, of 48 patients who declared satisfaction of 100-80% all were operated with the inverted-T technique (p &lt;0.001). For both the inverted T technique and the periareolar technique, the p-value according to the Friedman test for related samples was &lt;0.000.  Conclusions. In our experience, the periareolar mastopexy pattern has less satisfaction and more long-term complications than the inverted-T technique, from which we conclude that the periareolar mastopexy pattern is recommended in patients with grade I mammary ptosis and/or with small volume breast implants; mastopexy with the inverted-T technique has more satisfaction and fewer long-term complications like widening of the nipple-areola complex and breast asymmetry.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Mastopexia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Ptosis mamaria]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Complejo areola-pezón]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Mastopexy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Breast ptosis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Areola-nipple complex]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spear]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Augmentation/mastopexy: surgeon beware]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconst Surg]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>112</volume>
<page-range>906-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spear]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giese]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ducic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Concentric mastopexy revisited]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconst Surg]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>107</volume>
<page-range>1294-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rohrich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gosman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tonadapu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: a survey of board certi- fied plastic surgeons 2002]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconst Surg]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>114</volume>
<page-range>1724-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stevens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stoker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Freeman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ME]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quardt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hirsch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aesthetic Surg J]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>674-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Regnault]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Breast ptosis:Definition and treatment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Plast Surg]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>193-203</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tebbetts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: The high five decision support process]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconstr Surg]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>118</volume>
<numero>Suppl</numero>
<issue>Suppl</issue>
<page-range>35S-45S</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swanson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[All seasons vertical augmentation mastopexy: A simple algorithm, clinical experience, and patient-reported outcomes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>4</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mallucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Branford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: Analysis of the ideal breast]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<page-range>8-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tebbetts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A process for quantifying aesthetic and func- tional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconstr Surg]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>132</volume>
<page-range>65-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tebbetts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: II. Applying quantified dimensions of the skin envelope to design and preoperative planning for mastopexy and breast reduction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconstr Surg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>133</volume>
<page-range>527-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silvestri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Augmentation mammoplasty/mastopexy: Lessons learned from 107 aesthetic cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aesth Plast Surg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<page-range>896-907</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramanadham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harrison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rasko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Armijo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rohrich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Achieving predictability in augmentation mastopexy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconstr Surg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>133</volume>
<page-range>284e-92e</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doshier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eagan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colbert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Puckett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The subtleties of success in simultaneous augmentation-mastopexy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconstr Surg]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>138</volume>
<page-range>585-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nathan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mikhail]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nash]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mascarenhas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two-stage breast augmentation-mastopexy: How many return for the mastopexy?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconstr Surg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>133</volume>
<page-range>233e-4e</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moltó-García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villaverde-Doménech]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ME]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González-Alonso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ripoll-Orts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simon-Sanz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Periareolar augmentation mastopexy: A new approach dealing with the cases as tuberous breasts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Indian J Plast Surg]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>172-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berrocal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mastopexia con prótesis: técnica triplanar con cola de pez para mamas con pobre calidad de cobertura]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cir. plást. iberolatinoam]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>349-59</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rincón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cemboraim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[y Bookaman A. Uso de tomosíntesis como determinación del patrón vascular en cirugía mamaria secundaria]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cir. plást. Iberolatinoam]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>331-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
