<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0213-1285</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Avances en Odontoestomatología]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Av Odontoestomatol]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0213-1285</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ediciones Avances, S.L.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0213-12852018000100005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[¿Es necesario la remoción preventiva de las restauraciones de amalgama antigua en boca?. Evidencia clínica y legislativa (II)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Is necessary the remotion of old amalgam restorations?. Clinical and law evidence (II)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moradas Estrada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aaf"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Oviedo Clínica Universitaria Servicio de Odontología Conservadora]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Oviedo Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades Médico Quirúrgicas Servicio de Odontología Conservadora y Materiales Odontológicos]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>35</fpage>
<lpage>39</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0213-12852018000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0213-12852018000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0213-12852018000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN Después de años de cuidadosa investigación y de revisar más de 200 estudios científicos, la Administración de alimentos y fármacos de los Estados Unidos (FDA) reitera que la amalgama dental es un material seguro y efectivo para el uso de las restauraciones dentales. La Asociación Dental Americana (ADA) concuerda con la Administración de Alimentos y Fármacos de Estados Unidos (FDA) en su decisión de no establecer ninguna restricción en el uso de la amalgama dental, material de empaste comúnmente utilizado. &#8220;La FDA ha dejado la decisión sobre el tratamiento dental justo donde debiera estar: entre el dentista y el paciente&#8221;, afirma el doctor John S. Findley, presidente del ADA. &#8220;Esta decisión subraya lo que el: ADA lleva defendiendo desde hace tiempo: un debate entre dentistas y pacientes sobre la amplia variedad de opciones de tratamiento que ayude a que los pacientes sean conscientes de sus decisiones con respecto a su salud dental&#8221;. La resolución de la FDA cataloga la amalgama encapsulada como un dispositivo médico de clase II, lo que la sitúa en la misma clase que los empastes de oro y composite. La Asociación Dental Americana (ADA) ha defendido la designación de clase II para la amalgama desde que la FDA la propuso por primera vez en 2002.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[SUMMARY After years of careful research and over 200 scientific reviews, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reiterates that dental amalgam is a safe and effective material for the use of dental restorations. The American Dental Association (ADA) agrees with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in its decision not to impose any restrictions on the use of dental amalgam, a commonly used filling material. &#8220;The FDA has left the decision about dental treatment right where it should be - between the dentist and the patient,&#8221; says Dr. John S. Findley, president of the ADA. &#8220;This decision underscores what the ADA has been advocating for a long time: A debate between dentists and patients about the wide variety of treatment options that will help patients be aware of their decisions regarding their dental health. &#8220; The FDA resolution classifies encapsulated amalgam as a Class II medical device, placing it in the same class as the gold and composite fillings. The American Dental Association (ADA) has advocated class II designation for amalgam since the FDA first proposed it in 2002.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Materiales restauradores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[amalgama]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[mercurio]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[citotoxicidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[corrosión]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[amalgama FDA]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[amalgama ADA]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Restorative materials]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[amalgam]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[mercury]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[cytotoxicity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[passivation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[corrosion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[amalgam lobby]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[FDA amalgam]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[ADA AMALGAM]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The effect of 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yilmaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Misirlioglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Dentomaxillofac Radiol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>42-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mortazavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mortazavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Oral Radiology]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>1-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Amalgam contact hypersensitivity lesion: An unusual presentation-report of a rare case]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mortazavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mortazavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ann Med Health Sci Res]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>152-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields as a Hazard for People with Dental Amalgam Restorations]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mortazavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mortazavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[International J Advances in Science and Technology]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>153-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) Dental devices: classification of dental amalgam, reclassification of dental mercury, designation of special controls for dental amalgam, mercury, and amalgam alloy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fed Regist]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<numero>148</numero>
<issue>148</issue>
<page-range>38686-714</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A significant relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and urinary porphyrins: a further assessment of the Casa Pia Children's Dental Amalgam Trial]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carmody]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[King]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biometals]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>215-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A significant dose-dependent relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and kidney integrity biomarkers: a further assessment of the Casa Pia Children's Dental Amalgam Trial]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carmody]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[King]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Exp Toxicol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>434-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goldman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schafer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AI]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Cecil medicine 24]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Philadelphia ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier Saunders]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations-a meta-analysis]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heintze]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rousson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Adhes Dent]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>407-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>IAOMT (International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology) (2013) IAOMT position paper against dental mercury amalgam</collab>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: human health aspects]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[United Nations Environment Programme: World Health Organization]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evidence of parallels between mercury intoxication and the brain pathology in autism]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Audhya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[King]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sykes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<page-range>113-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Thimerosal exposure and the role of sulfation chemistry and thiol availability in autism]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Haley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sykes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[King]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Environ Res Public Health]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>3771-800</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
