<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1137-6627</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Anales Sis San Navarra]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1137-6627</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gobierno de Navarra. Departamento de Salud]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1137-66272017000300351</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23938/assn.0043</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Validación de la capacidad predictiva de resultado de parto del índice de Bishop y Burnett modificado por paridad]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Predictive validity of Bishop and Burnett Scores for vaginal delivery modified by parity]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández-Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molina-Alarcón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pascual-Pedreño]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baño-Garnés]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Redondo-González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez-Salgado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aaf"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital &#8220;Mancha-Centro&#8221;  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Alcázar de San Juan Ciudad Real]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha Facultad de Enfermería ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Albacete ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Huelva Facultad de Enfermería ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Huelva ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Guayaquil ]]></addr-line>
<country>Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>351</fpage>
<lpage>360</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1137-66272017000300351&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1137-66272017000300351&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1137-66272017000300351&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Fundamento. Validar la capacidad predictiva del resultado de parto de los índices Bishop (BS) y Burnett (BRS) frente a versiones modificadas en las que se incorpora la paridad (BSM y BRSM).  Método. Cohortes históricas sobre un total de 728 inducciones realizadas durante los años 2011-2013 en el Hospital &#8220;La Mancha-Centro&#8221; (HLMC) de Alcázar de San Juan. Se evaluaron las características predictivas (análisis de validez interna) mediante áreas bajo la curva (ABC) ROC de cada parámetro de los BS y BRS y de la paridad, así como de cada uno de los 4 índices.  Resultados. La paridad y todos los parámetros del BS y BRS, a excepción de la estación fetal y la posición del cuello, se asociaron con el resultado de parto. Se definieron dos nuevas escalas modificadas a partir del BS y BRS, previa eliminación del parámetro de la estación fetal, por ser el que menor capacidad discriminativa mostraba: BSM y BRSM. Se asignó un valor de 0 en las nulíparas y, en el caso de las multíparas, 3 puntos a BSM y 2 a BRSM. Los índices modificados mostraron una capacidad predictiva (ABC) de parto vaginal superior a la de los índices originales, tanto para BS (0,70 vs. 0,62) como para BRS (0,69 vs. 0,62).  Conclusión. Los índices modificados BSM y BRSM, donde se sustituye el parámetro altura de la presentación por la paridad, presentan mejor capacidad predictiva respecto de los índices originales BS y BRS para determinar el resultado de parto.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Background. Validating the predictive capacity on the outcome of labour of the Bishop Score (BS) and the simplified Burnett Score (BRS) compared to their modified versions, in which parity is incorporated.  Methods. Historical cohorts out of a total of 728 inductions during the years 2012-2013 in the &#8220;La Mancha-Centro&#8221; Hospital of Alcázar de San Juan. We evaluated the predictive characteristics by areas under the (AUC) ROC curve for each parameter of BS and BRS and for parity, as well as for each of the 4 indices.  Results. Parity and all the parameters of BS and BRS, except for foetal station and cervical position, were associated with the outcome of labour. Two modified scales were defined on the basis of BS and BRS, following removal of the &#8220;foetal station&#8221; parameter due to its low discriminative capacity: BSM and BRSM. Nulliparity was given a value of 0 points, and multiparity a value of 3 points for BSM, and 2 for BRSM. Modified indices showed a higher predictive ability (AUC) for vaginal delivery than the original indices, for both BS (0.70 vs. 0.62) and for BRS (0.69 vs. 0.62).  Conclusion. Replacing the &#8220;foetal station&#8221; parameter with parity in BS and BRS, improves predictive capacity with regard to the original indices in order to determine the outcome of labour.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Inducción de parto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Resultado de parto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Modelo predictivo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Índice de Bishop]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Paridad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Induction of labour]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Outcome of labour]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Predictive model]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Bishop Score]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Parity]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Inducción de parto. Protocolos prosego]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZEITLIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOHANGOO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DELNORD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010. European perinatal health report 2014]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>90-2</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[EUROPERISTAT]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bishop]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Pelvic scoring for elective induction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>1964</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<page-range>266-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burnett Jr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Preinduction scoring: an objective approach to induction of labor]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>479-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>573-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teixeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lunet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrigues]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barros]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Gynecol Obstet]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>286</volume>
<page-range>739-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kolkman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verhoeven]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brinkhorst]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van der Post]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pajkrt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Opmeer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Perinatol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>625-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laughon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Troendle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reddy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[UM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<page-range>805-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Journet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaucherand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doret]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Score de Bishop modifié par la parité pour le déclenchement du travail à terme: une étude rétrospective]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>339-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bertossa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Novakov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stupar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ZT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Milatovic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boulvain]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Irion]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Validity of clinical and ultrasound variables to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>120</volume>
<page-range>53-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cheung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahota]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TY]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>1406-12</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guirgis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Higgins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>315-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Delaney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Butt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bennett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hutchens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Young]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>319-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hosmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lemeshow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Applied logistic regression]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Willey]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bueno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[San-Frutos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perez-Medina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barbancho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Troyano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bajo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The labor induction integrated clinical and sonographic variables that predict the outcome]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Perinatol]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>4-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cnattingius]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoglund]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kieler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>84</volume>
<page-range>456-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pitarello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tadashi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zugaib]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prediction of successful labor induction using transvaginal sonographic cervical measurements]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Clin Ultrasound]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>76-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dhall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mittal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kumar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>309-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>114</volume>
<page-range>386-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leduc]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biringer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Corbett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leduc]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Induction of labour]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Obstet Gynaecol Can]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>840-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
