<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1886-5887</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista de Bioética y Derecho]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Bioética y Derecho]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1886-5887</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Observatori de Bioètica i Dret - Cátedra UNESCO de Bioética]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1886-58872017000200017</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Paradiso y Campanelli c. Italia (II): los casos difíciles crean mal derecho(I)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (II): hard cases make bad law(I)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farnós-Amorós]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Esther]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universitat Pompeu Fabra  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>40</numero>
<fpage>231</fpage>
<lpage>242</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1886-58872017000200017&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1886-58872017000200017&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1886-58872017000200017&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen La sentencia del TEDH del pasado 24 de enero pone punto y final al asunto Paradiso y Campanelli c. Italia, en que las autoridades italianas declararon en situación de desamparo a un menor que había pasado sus primeros ocho meses de vida con los comitentes, dos cónyuges italianos que habían accedido a la gestación por sustitución con gametos donados en Rusia. La Gran Sala se aparta del razonamiento seguido por la Sec. 2ª y considera que la actuación de las autoridades nacionales no vulnera el art. 8 CEDH. Así, no existe interferencia en la vida familiar de los comitentes y la injerencia en su vida privada se encuentra justificada. Aunque es cierto que una decisión en sentido contrario podría conducir a legalizar situaciones creadas contraviniendo la legislación italiana, el análisis que la Gran Sala realiza de la conducta de las autoridades nacionales presenta varios puntos débiles. Pese a ello, Paradiso (II) es un caso difícil del cual no pueden extraerse conclusiones generales, más allá de confirmar la necesidad de mayor control de una práctica que presenta riesgos claros de explotación.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract Last January the 27, the Grand Chamber of the FARNÓS of Human Rights delivered its final judgement in Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy, in which the Italian authorities declared in a state of abandonment a child conceived with donated gametes and gestated in Russia through surrogacy ordered by Italian spouses with whom the child had spent her first eight months of life. The decision, which overturns the previous ruling by the 2nd Section, considers that the national authorities' behavior does not infringe art. 8 ECHR, since it does not interfere with the commissioning parents' family life, but constitutes a justified interference with their private life. Although a contrary solution could lead to legalize a situation created by them against the Italian law, the Grand Chamber's analysis on the national authorities' behavior contains some weak points. In spite of this, Paradiso (II) is a difficult case from which general readings cannot be inferred but it confirms the need of monitoring a practice which poses serious exploitation risks.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[gestación por sustitución internacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[vida privada y familiar]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[declaración de desamparo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[vínculo genético.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[international surrogacy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[private and family life]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[state of abandonment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[genetic link.]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BEAUMONT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TRIMMINGS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the area of cross-border surrogacy: is there still a need for global regulation of surrogacy?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>1-17</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>CGPJ</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los jueces avalan la decisión del Consulado español en Moscú de negar el salvoconducto de salida de un bebé nacido por 'maternidad subrogada]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[La Ley]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COHEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GI]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Medical Tourism and the Creation of Life: A Study of Fertility Tourism]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COHEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GI]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Patients with passports: medical tourism, law and ethics]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>371-420</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[OUP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Questions and Answers on the Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy judgment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>1-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FARNÓS-AMORÓS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["¿Debe permitirse la gestación por sustitución en España? Estado de la cuestión y algunas reflexiones]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CASADO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[De la solidaridad al mercado. El cuerpo humano y el comercio biotecnológico]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>193-233</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FARNÓS-AMORÓS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La reproducción asistida ante el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos: De Evans c. Reino Unido a Parrillo c. Italia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Bioética y Derecho &amp; Perspectivas Bioéticas]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<page-range>93-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HERTZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NELSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SUÑOL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Attitudes toward Regulations of Reproductive Care in the European Union: A Comparison between Travellers for Cross-Border Reproductive Care and Citizens of the Local Country]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Facts Views Vis Obgyn]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>147-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HONORATI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Paradiso e Campanelli c. Italia, atto secondo: la Corte EDU definisce la nozione di "vita familiare" e ribalta la sentenza precedente]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>1-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KEMELMAJER-DE-CARLUCCI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HERRERA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LAMM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DE-LA-TORRE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La gestación por sustitución en el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. A propósito del caso Paradiso y Campanelli c. Italia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[La Ley]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>49</numero>
<issue>49</issue>
<page-range>6-10</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PENASA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Il caso Paradiso e Campanelli c. Italia: verso modelli familiari 'a geometria variabile'?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rivista di BioDiritto]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>1-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PENNINGS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Human Reproduction]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>2689-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[QUIÑONES-ESCÁMEZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Doble filiación paterna de gemelos nacidos en el extranjero mediante maternidad subrogada. En torno a la RDGRN de 18 de febrero de 2009]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[InDret]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<page-range>1-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[QUIÑONES-ESCÁMEZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El orden público interno, europeo e internacional civil: Acto en homenaje a la Dra. Núria Bouza Vidal, catedrática de Derecho internacional privado]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[InDret]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>201-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SHENFIELD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De-MOUZON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PENNINGS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERRARETTI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NYBOE-ANDERSEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De-WERT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOOSSENS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cross border reproductive care in six European countries]]></article-title>
<collab>The ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Human Reproduction]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1361-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VELA-SÁNCHEZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["¿Ha variado el TEDH su Doctrina favorable a los convenios de gestación por sustitución realizados en países que legalmente los permiten?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[La Ley]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>8953</numero>
<issue>8953</issue>
<page-range>1-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
